Steven Hughes

2.5k total citations
58 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Steven Hughes is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven Hughes has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Molecular Biology, 31 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 23 papers in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems. Recurrent topics in Steven Hughes's work include Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (25 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (23 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (23 papers). Steven Hughes is often cited by papers focused on Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (25 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (23 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (23 papers). Steven Hughes collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Steven Hughes's co-authors include Stuart N. Peirson, Mark W. Hankins, F. Foster, Alicia J. El Haj, Jon Dobson, Aarti Jagannath, Jessica Rodgers, Carina A. Pothecary, Stephanie Halford and Michael Turton and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Steven Hughes

55 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Steven Hughes
Gurprit S. Lall United Kingdom
Ernest F. Terwilliger United States
Gajanan Nilaver United States
Gerd Bicker Germany
Dirk R. Albrecht United States
Sabine Frank Germany
Greg S. B. Suh United States
Marcia G. Honig United States
Gurprit S. Lall United Kingdom
Steven Hughes
Citations per year, relative to Steven Hughes Steven Hughes (= 1×) peers Gurprit S. Lall

Countries citing papers authored by Steven Hughes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Hughes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Hughes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Hughes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Hughes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Hughes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Hughes. The network helps show where Steven Hughes may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven Hughes

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven Hughes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven Hughes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven Hughes. Steven Hughes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hughes, Steven, et al.. (2025). Interaction between native and prosthetic visual responses in optogenetic visual restoration. JCI Insight. 10(11). 2 indexed citations
2.
Rodgers, Jessica, Steven Hughes, Annette E. Allen, et al.. (2025). Enhanced restoration of visual code after targeting ON bipolar cells compared with retinal ganglion cells with optogenetic therapy. Molecular Therapy. 33(3). 1264–1281. 4 indexed citations
3.
Gilhooley, Michael James, et al.. (2022). A systematic comparison of optogenetic approaches to visual restoration. Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development. 25. 111–123. 17 indexed citations
4.
Lindner, Moritz, Michael James Gilhooley, Steven Hughes, & Mark W. Hankins. (2022). Optogenetics for visual restoration: From proof of principle to translational challenges. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research. 91. 101089–101089. 39 indexed citations
5.
Herremans, Kelly M., Andrea N. Riner, Jeremy A. Balch, et al.. (2022). From bench to bedside: Pursuing equity in precision medicine approaches to pancreatic cancer care. Frontiers in Oncology. 12. 1086779–1086779.
6.
Hughes, Steven, Jessica K. Edwards, Carina A. Pothecary, et al.. (2021). Zfhx3 modulates retinal sensitivity and circadian responses to light. The FASEB Journal. 35(9). e21802–e21802. 5 indexed citations
7.
Lindner, Moritz, Michael James Gilhooley, Stuart N. Peirson, Steven Hughes, & Mark W. Hankins. (2020). The functional characteristics of optogenetic gene therapy for vision restoration. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 78(4). 1597–1613. 11 indexed citations
8.
Gilhooley, Michael James, Doron G. Hickey, Steven Hughes, & Mark W. Hankins. (2018). Retinal bipolar cell gene changes in the rd1 model of inherited retinal degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 59(9). 1007–1007. 1 indexed citations
9.
Gilhooley, Michael James, et al.. (2018). Melanopsin: photoreceptors, physiology and potential. Current Opinion in Physiology. 5. 68–74. 8 indexed citations
10.
Rodgers, Jessica, Stuart N. Peirson, Steven Hughes, & Mark W. Hankins. (2018). Functional characterisation of naturally occurring mutations in human melanopsin. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 75(19). 3609–3624. 17 indexed citations
11.
Silva, Samantha R. De, Alun R. Barnard, Steven Hughes, et al.. (2017). Long-term restoration of visual function in end-stage retinal degeneration using subretinal human melanopsin gene therapy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(42). 11211–11216. 64 indexed citations
12.
Tam, Shu K. E., Sibah Hasan, Harry Choi, et al.. (2017). Constant Light Desynchronizes Olfactory versus Object and Visuospatial Recognition Memory Performance. Journal of Neuroscience. 37(13). 3555–3567. 14 indexed citations
13.
Tam, Shu K. E., Sibah Hasan, Steven Hughes, et al.. (2016). Modulation of recognition memory performance by light requires both melanopsin and classical photoreceptors. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 283(1845). 20162275–20162275. 28 indexed citations
14.
Hughes, Steven, F. Foster, Stuart N. Peirson, & Mark W. Hankins. (2016). Inhibitory effects of fluoxetine on photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12). 4660–4660. 1 indexed citations
15.
Hughes, Steven, Aarti Jagannath, Jessica Rodgers, et al.. (2016). Signalling by melanopsin (OPN4) expressing photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. Eye. 30(2). 247–254. 58 indexed citations
16.
Hughes, Steven, Jessica Rodgers, Doron G. Hickey, et al.. (2016). Characterisation of light responses in the retina of mice lacking principle components of rod, cone and melanopsin phototransduction signalling pathways. Scientific Reports. 6(1). 28086–28086. 36 indexed citations
17.
Rodgers, Jessica, Steven Hughes, Carina A. Pothecary, et al.. (2015). Characterisation of a novel ENU-induced spectral tuning mutation in melanopsin. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 56(7). 5574–5574. 1 indexed citations
18.
Hickey, Doron G., Steven Hughes, Wayne I. L. Davies, Robert E. MacLaren, & Mark W. Hankins. (2014). Human opsin-G-protein fusion proteins as potential light sensitizers. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 5768–5768. 1 indexed citations
19.
Hughes, Steven, et al.. (2006). Ion channel agonist release scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. 11. 2. 1 indexed citations
20.
Cartmell, Sarah H., et al.. (2002). Mechanical conditioning of bone cells in vitro using magnetic microparticle technology. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 4. 130–131. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026