Mark W. Hankins

8.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
103 papers, 6.7k citations indexed

About

Mark W. Hankins is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark W. Hankins has authored 103 papers receiving a total of 6.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 79 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 69 papers in Molecular Biology and 55 papers in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems. Recurrent topics in Mark W. Hankins's work include Retinal Development and Disorders (66 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (62 papers) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (55 papers). Mark W. Hankins is often cited by papers focused on Retinal Development and Disorders (66 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (62 papers) and Circadian rhythm and melatonin (55 papers). Mark W. Hankins collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Mark W. Hankins's co-authors include F. Foster, Robert J. Lucas, Stuart N. Peirson, Samer Hattar, Steven Hughes, King‐Wai Yau, James Bellingham, Emma E. Tarttelin, Alun R. Barnard and Stewart Thompson and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Cell and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Mark W. Hankins

102 papers receiving 6.6k citations

Hit Papers

Melanopsin and rod–cone photoreceptive systems account fo... 2003 2026 2010 2018 2003 2008 250 500 750

Peers

Mark W. Hankins
Ignacio Provencio United States
Gianluca Tosini United States
Felice A. Dunn United States
Samer Hattar United States
Mark D. Rollag United States
Paul D. Gamlin United States
Douglas G. McMahon United States
Gary E. Pickard United States
Mark W. Hankins
Citations per year, relative to Mark W. Hankins Mark W. Hankins (= 1×) peers Motoharu Takao

Countries citing papers authored by Mark W. Hankins

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark W. Hankins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark W. Hankins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark W. Hankins more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark W. Hankins

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark W. Hankins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark W. Hankins. The network helps show where Mark W. Hankins may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark W. Hankins

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark W. Hankins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark W. Hankins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark W. Hankins. Mark W. Hankins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hughes, Steven, et al.. (2025). Interaction between native and prosthetic visual responses in optogenetic visual restoration. JCI Insight. 10(11). 2 indexed citations
2.
Rodgers, Jessica, Steven Hughes, Annette E. Allen, et al.. (2025). Enhanced restoration of visual code after targeting ON bipolar cells compared with retinal ganglion cells with optogenetic therapy. Molecular Therapy. 33(3). 1264–1281. 4 indexed citations
3.
Gilhooley, Michael James, et al.. (2022). A systematic comparison of optogenetic approaches to visual restoration. Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development. 25. 111–123. 17 indexed citations
4.
Hughes, Steven, Jessica K. Edwards, Carina A. Pothecary, et al.. (2021). Zfhx3 modulates retinal sensitivity and circadian responses to light. The FASEB Journal. 35(9). e21802–e21802. 5 indexed citations
5.
Lindner, Moritz, Michael James Gilhooley, Stuart N. Peirson, Steven Hughes, & Mark W. Hankins. (2020). The functional characteristics of optogenetic gene therapy for vision restoration. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 78(4). 1597–1613. 11 indexed citations
6.
Hankins, Mark W. & Curtis E. Margo. (2019). Histopathological evaluation of scleritis. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 72(5). 386–390. 13 indexed citations
7.
Gilhooley, Michael James, Doron G. Hickey, Steven Hughes, & Mark W. Hankins. (2018). Retinal bipolar cell gene changes in the rd1 model of inherited retinal degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 59(9). 1007–1007. 1 indexed citations
8.
Gilhooley, Michael James, et al.. (2018). Melanopsin: photoreceptors, physiology and potential. Current Opinion in Physiology. 5. 68–74. 8 indexed citations
9.
Silva, Samantha R. De, Alun R. Barnard, Steven Hughes, et al.. (2017). Long-term restoration of visual function in end-stage retinal degeneration using subretinal human melanopsin gene therapy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(42). 11211–11216. 64 indexed citations
10.
Tam, Shu K. E., Sibah Hasan, Harry Choi, et al.. (2017). Constant Light Desynchronizes Olfactory versus Object and Visuospatial Recognition Memory Performance. Journal of Neuroscience. 37(13). 3555–3567. 14 indexed citations
11.
Tam, Shu K. E., Sibah Hasan, Steven Hughes, et al.. (2016). Modulation of recognition memory performance by light requires both melanopsin and classical photoreceptors. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 283(1845). 20162275–20162275. 28 indexed citations
12.
Hughes, Steven, F. Foster, Stuart N. Peirson, & Mark W. Hankins. (2016). Inhibitory effects of fluoxetine on photosensitive retinal ganglion cells. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12). 4660–4660. 1 indexed citations
13.
Rodgers, Jessica, Steven Hughes, Carina A. Pothecary, et al.. (2015). Characterisation of a novel ENU-induced spectral tuning mutation in melanopsin. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 56(7). 5574–5574. 1 indexed citations
14.
Hickey, Doron G., Steven Hughes, Wayne I. L. Davies, Robert E. MacLaren, & Mark W. Hankins. (2014). Human opsin-G-protein fusion proteins as potential light sensitizers. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 5768–5768. 1 indexed citations
15.
Momiji, Hiroshi, Mark W. Hankins, Anil A. Bharath, & Christopher Kennard. (2007). A numerical study of red–green colour opponent properties in the primate retina. European Journal of Neuroscience. 25(4). 1155–1165. 6 indexed citations
16.
Barnard, Alun R., Samer Hattar, Mark W. Hankins, & Robert J. Lucas. (2006). Melanopsin Regulates Visual Processing in the Mouse Retina. Current Biology. 16(4). 389–395. 132 indexed citations
17.
Sekaran, Sumathi, R G Foster, Robert J. Lucas, & Mark W. Hankins. (2004). Early development of intrinsic photosensitivity of inner retinal neurones in the marine retina.. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 2263–2263. 2 indexed citations
18.
Jenkins, Aaron, M. Muñoz, Emma E. Tarttelin, et al.. (2003). VA Opsin, Melanopsin, and an Inherent Light Response within Retinal Interneurons. Current Biology. 13(15). 1269–1278. 66 indexed citations
19.
Jenkins, Aaron, et al.. (2001). Novel depolarising responses in a population of horizontal cells in the cyprinid retina.. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 42. 2 indexed citations
20.
Hankins, Mark W., Simon R. Jones, Aaron Jenkins, & Antony B. Morland. (2001). Diurnal daylight phase affects the temporal properties of both the b-wave and d-wave of the human electroretinogram. Brain Research. 889(1-2). 339–343. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026