Steven C. Port

2.9k total citations
55 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Steven C. Port is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Steven C. Port has authored 55 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 28 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 13 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Steven C. Port's work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (28 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (10 papers). Steven C. Port is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (28 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (10 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (10 papers). Steven C. Port collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Steven C. Port's co-authors include Frederick R. Cobb, R. Edward Coleman, Robert H. Jones, Donald H. Schmidt, Rami Gal, M T Upton, Stephen K. Rerych, G E Newman, Patricia McEwan and Robert H. Jones and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Circulation and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Steven C. Port

53 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Steven C. Port

CCM

RNMI

SURGE

PRM

CAM

R Gourgon France

A‐Hamid Hakki United States

R Gianrossi Italy

Alessandro Imparato Italy

J L Weiss United Kingdom

L R Poliner United States

Annick Haouzi United States

Quirino Ciampi Italy

Francesca Maria Righini Italy

J Grimm Switzerland

R Gourgon France

Steven C. Port

1.2k ×1.2

CCM

356 ×0.4

RNMI

300 ×1.1

SURGE

182 ×0.9

PRM

359 ×1.8

CAM

Citations per year, relative to Steven C. Port Steven C. Port (= 1×) peers R Gourgon

Countries citing papers authored by Steven C. Port

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven C. Port's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven C. Port with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven C. Port more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven C. Port

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven C. Port. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven C. Port. The network helps show where Steven C. Port may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steven C. Port

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steven C. Port. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steven C. Port based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steven C. Port. Steven C. Port is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Zlochiver, Viviana, et al.. (2024). Differences and Disparities Among Self-Referred and Physician-Referred Populations Undergoing Coronary Artery Calcium Scanning. Circulation Cardiovascular Imaging. 17(2). e015712–e015712. 3 indexed citations

Port, Steven C., et al.. (2020). Feasibility of exercise treadmill 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging using an off-site cyclotron. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 29(3). 938–945. 1 indexed citations

Suma, Valentin, et al.. (2019). Giant Congenital Left Atrial Appendage Aneurysm Presenting With Recurrent Supraventricular Tachycardia and Chest Pain. CASE. 3(3). 129–132. 7 indexed citations

Shafiq, Ali, et al.. (2017). Metastatic breast cancer diagnosed by rubidium-82 positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 25(3). 1048–1050. 1 indexed citations

Allaqaband, Suhail, et al.. (2017). Influence of Differential Calcification in the Descending Thoracic Aorta on Aortic Pulse Pressure. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(3). 104–113. 4 indexed citations

Port, Steven C., et al.. (2017). The complementary nature of tissue Doppler to 99mTc-PYP imaging in diagnosis of right ventricular cardiac amyloidosis. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 25(4). 1412–1414. 1 indexed citations

Mor‐Avi, Victor, Nadjia Kachenoura, Francesco Maffessanti, et al.. (2016). Three-dimensional quantification of myocardial perfusion during regadenoson stress computed tomography. European Journal of Radiology. 85(5). 885–892. 3 indexed citations

Renaud, Jennifer M., Jean Guimond, Mikaël Trottier, et al.. (2016). Characterization of 3-Dimensional PET Systems for Accurate Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 58(1). 103–109. 44 indexed citations

Port, Steven C., et al.. (2016). The incarcerated heart: porcelain cage. European Heart Journal. 37(29). 2293–2293.

10.

Ammar, Khawaja Afzal, Bijoy K. Khandheria, Tanvir Bajwa, et al.. (2016). Cardiac Amyloidosis Presenting as Severe Mitral Regurgitation. JACC. Cardiovascular imaging. 9(8). 1003–1006. 6 indexed citations

11.

Bettmann, M A, et al.. (2000). Recurrent symptoms following lower extremity arterial bypass surgery. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.. PubMed. 215 Suppl. 89–93. 4 indexed citations

12.

Foster, Carl, Rami Gal, Patrick Murphy, Steven C. Port, & Donald H. Schmidt. (1997). Left ventricular function during exercise testing and training. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 29(3). 297–305. 15 indexed citations

13.

Foster, Carl, et al.. (1995). First-pass radionuclide angiography during bicycle and treadmill exercise. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 2(6). 485–490. 5 indexed citations

14.

Zwicke, Dianne, et al.. (1994). High incidence of renal artery stenosis in patients with coronary artery disease. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis. 32(1). 8–10. 140 indexed citations

15.

Schelbert, Heinrich, Robert O. Bonow, Edward M. Geltman, et al.. (1993). Position statement: clinical use of cardiac positron emission tomography. Position paper of the Cardiovascular Council of the Society of Nuclear Medicine.. PubMed. 34(8). 1385–8. 8 indexed citations

16.

Gal, Rami, et al.. (1991). Long‐term prognostic value of a normal dipyridamole thallium‐201 perfusion scan. Clinical Cardiology. 14(12). 971–974. 4 indexed citations

17.

Gal, Rami, et al.. (1990). Technically suboptimal first-pass radionuclide angiographic studies. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 16(1). 11–16. 2 indexed citations

18.

Massardo, Teresa, et al.. (1990). Left ventricular volume calculation using a count-based ratio method applied to first-pass radionuclide angiography.. PubMed. 31(12). 2124–32. 73 indexed citations

19.

Port, Steven C., et al.. (1985). Assessment of single vessel coronary artery disease: Results of exercise electrocardiography, thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging and radionuclide angiography. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 6(1). 75–83. 23 indexed citations

20.

Port, Steven C., et al.. (1984). Effects of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation on myocardial blood flow in patients with severe coronary artery disease. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 3(6). 1367–1374. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact