Steve Schutz

847 total citations
11 papers, 608 citations indexed

About

Steve Schutz is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Steve Schutz has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 608 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Surgery, 5 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 4 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Steve Schutz's work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (4 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers) and Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (4 papers). Steve Schutz is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (4 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (4 papers) and Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments (4 papers). Steve Schutz collaborates with scholars based in United States and Canada. Steve Schutz's co-authors include Peter B. Cotton, Joseph W. Leung, Paul S. Jowell, John G. Lee, Ruth England, Eric Libby, Todd H. Baron, Glenn M. Eisen, Joseph Romagnuolo and Paul R. Tarnasky and has published in prestigious journals such as Gut, The American Journal of Gastroenterology and American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology.

In The Last Decade

Steve Schutz

11 papers receiving 584 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Steve Schutz United States	8	429	362	276	85	84	11	608
Arnaud Deroover Belgium	15	531 1.2×	221 0.6×	127 0.5×	154 1.8×	3 0.0×	34	695
G.N. Stultiëns Netherlands	6	441 1.0×	254 0.7×	85 0.3×	60 0.7×	16 0.2×	8	543
Raúl Almenara Spain	9	385 0.9×	76 0.2×	96 0.3×	155 1.8×	48 0.6×	23	433
J.P.A. Lodge United Kingdom	12	163 0.4×	101 0.3×	52 0.2×	46 0.5×	9 0.1×	29	314
S. E. Burpee Canada	12	367 0.9×	129 0.4×	198 0.7×	60 0.7×	77 0.9×	13	519
H Obertop Netherlands	11	498 1.2×	304 0.8×	173 0.6×	92 1.1×	74 0.9×	22	618
C Kennedy United Kingdom	11	226 0.5×	210 0.6×	56 0.2×	10 0.1×	31 0.4×	16	346
Bruce Fox United Kingdom	11	196 0.5×	165 0.5×	130 0.5×	6 0.1×	44 0.5×	19	371
David S. Loeb United States	11	590 1.4×	374 1.0×	141 0.5×	5 0.1×	222 2.6×	25	693
Mark K. Ferguson United States	10	348 0.8×	327 0.9×	84 0.3×	16 0.2×	115 1.4×	11	565

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Schutz

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Schutz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Schutz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Schutz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Schutz

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Schutz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Schutz. The network helps show where Steve Schutz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steve Schutz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steve Schutz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steve Schutz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steve Schutz. Steve Schutz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Cotton, Peter B., Glenn M. Eisen, Joseph Romagnuolo, et al.. (2011). Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 73(5). 868–874. 174 indexed citations

2.

Cotton, Peter B., Patrick Connor, Daniel McGee, et al.. (2003). Colonoscopy: Practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 57(3). 352–357. 92 indexed citations

3.

Wallace, Michael B., Valerie Durkalski, Yuko Y. Palesch, et al.. (2001). Age and alarm symptoms do not predict endoscopic findings among patients with dyspepsia: a multicentre database study. Gut. 49(1). 29–34. 88 indexed citations

4.

Fingas, Mervin F., et al.. (2001). Studies of Emissions From Oil Fires. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings. 2001(1). 539–544. 5 indexed citations

5.

Cotton, Peter B., James E. Vaughn, Alan Barkun, et al.. (2000). Analyzing ERCP practice by a modified degree of difficulty scale: a multicenter database analysis. The American Journal of Gastroenterology. 95(9). 2480–2481. 9 indexed citations

6.

Schutz, Steve, et al.. (1997). Successful endoscopic removal of a severed, impacted Dormia basket.. PubMed. 92(4). 679–81. 18 indexed citations

7.

England, R, Steve Schutz, & Joseph W. Leung. (1996). “Air-in a view”. British Journal of Radiology. 69(823). 681–682. 1 indexed citations

8.

Chari, Ravi S., et al.. (1996). Adenosine nucleotides in bile. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology. 270(2). G246–G252. 75 indexed citations

9.

Lee, John G., Steve Schutz, Ruth England, Joseph W. Leung, & Peter B. Cotton. (1995). Endoscopic therapy of sclerosing cholangitis.. PubMed. 21(3). 661–7. 101 indexed citations

10.

Lievens, Marc & Steve Schutz. (1995). Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy: is gall stone recurrence inevitable?. PubMed. 41(3). 271–2. 2 indexed citations

11.

Schutz, Steve, et al.. (1994). Santorinicele: New evidence for obstruction in pancreas divisum. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 40(1). 73–76. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact