Steve Love

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
52 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Steve Love is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Information Systems and Human-Computer Interaction. According to data from OpenAlex, Steve Love has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Information Systems and Management, 11 papers in Information Systems and 10 papers in Human-Computer Interaction. Recurrent topics in Steve Love's work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (15 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (7 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (6 papers). Steve Love is often cited by papers focused on Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (15 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (7 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (6 papers). Steve Love collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Jordan and Germany. Steve Love's co-authors include Nalin Asanka Gamagedara Arachchilage, Ahmad Abu-Al-Aish, Konstantin Beznosov, Mark Turner, Tom McEwan, Kate Hone, Mark Perry, Ziad Hunaiti, Rand Al-Dmour and T. Schneider and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Computers in Human Behavior and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.

In The Last Decade

Steve Love

50 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: A... 2013 2026 2017 2021 2013 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steve Love United Kingdom 15 617 385 316 176 152 52 1.1k
Mark Keith United States 17 383 0.6× 660 1.7× 345 1.1× 104 0.6× 29 0.2× 50 1.2k
Rick Wash United States 22 854 1.4× 997 2.6× 165 0.5× 241 1.4× 162 1.1× 53 1.9k
Anne C. Rose United States 14 246 0.4× 261 0.7× 102 0.3× 229 1.3× 81 0.5× 67 1.2k
Linda Schamber United States 14 709 1.1× 175 0.5× 211 0.7× 421 2.4× 110 0.7× 25 1.3k
Amela Karahasanović Norway 14 654 1.1× 324 0.8× 147 0.5× 215 1.2× 39 0.3× 34 1.3k
Monica Landoni Switzerland 21 702 1.1× 237 0.6× 286 0.9× 180 1.0× 355 2.3× 124 1.3k
Matthew L. Jensen United States 21 527 0.9× 692 1.8× 188 0.6× 315 1.8× 28 0.2× 87 1.5k
Ahmad Althunibat Jordan 14 465 0.8× 207 0.5× 402 1.3× 256 1.5× 476 3.1× 49 1.4k
Daniel C. Howe United States 8 194 0.3× 510 1.3× 291 0.9× 112 0.6× 26 0.2× 23 894
Allen Foster United Kingdom 13 593 1.0× 241 0.6× 264 0.8× 199 1.1× 104 0.7× 26 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Love

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Love's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Love with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Love more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Love

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Love. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Love. The network helps show where Steve Love may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steve Love

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steve Love. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steve Love based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steve Love. Steve Love is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Yamada‐Rice, Dylan, et al.. (2023). The importance of multimodal play and storytelling in medtech for children: A Case Study of Co-designing a Mixed Realities Play Kit to Prepare 4 to 10-year-Olds for an MRI Scan. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 3(2). 170–196.
2.
Schneider, T., et al.. (2023). Don’t fail me! The Level 5 Autonomous Driving Information Dilemma regarding Transparency and User Experience. RADAR (Glasgow School of Art). 540–552. 8 indexed citations
3.
Jeffrey, Stuart, Steve Love, & Matthieu Poyade. (2021). The Digital Laocoön: Replication, Narrative and Authenticity. Museum and Society. 19(2). 166–183. 3 indexed citations
4.
Schneider, T., et al.. (2021). Increasing the User Experience in Autonomous Driving through different Feedback Modalities. RADAR (Glasgow School of Art). 7–10. 20 indexed citations
5.
Al-Dmour, Rand, Steve Love, & Mutaz M. Al‐Debei. (2015). Measuring the effectiveness of HRIS practice in business organisations: a study in the context of a developing country. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research. 9(5). 507–507. 4 indexed citations
6.
Al-Dmour, Rand & Steve Love. (2015). An integrated model for identifying the determinants of the adoption of human resources information system applications in business organisations. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research. 9(6). 631–631. 1 indexed citations
7.
Love, Steve, et al.. (2015). Exploring the Challenges of m-Government Adoption in Saudi Arabia. 7 indexed citations
8.
Love, Steve, et al.. (2013). Predicting Consumer Decisions to Adopt Mobile Commerce in Saudi Arabia. Americas Conference on Information Systems. 2 indexed citations
9.
Love, Steve, Kate Hone, & Tom McEwan. (2013). Proceedings of the 27th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference. 36 indexed citations
10.
Love, Steve, et al.. (2009). Does cognitive style affect student performance on a web-based course?. 3. 2 indexed citations
11.
Lycett, Mark, et al.. (2008). Enhancing Customer Experience within the Mobile Telecommunications Industry. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 874–888. 4 indexed citations
12.
Love, Steve, et al.. (2008). Evaluating WebCT Use in Relation to Students' Attitude and Performance. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education. 4(2). 26–43. 19 indexed citations
13.
Love, Steve, et al.. (2008). The affect of lecturers' attitude on students' use of an online learning environment. 1–8. 2 indexed citations
14.
Love, Steve, et al.. (2008). Mobile Phone Use Across Cultures. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction. 4(2). 35–51. 3 indexed citations
15.
Love, Steve, et al.. (2007). User characteristics and performance with automated mobile phone systems. International Journal of Mobile Communications. 6(1). 1–1. 20 indexed citations
16.
Love, Steve & Rosa Scoble. (2006). Developing a quality assurance metric. Active Learning in Higher Education. 7(2). 129–141. 2 indexed citations
17.
Brinkman, Willem‐Paul & Steve Love. (2006). Developing an instrument to assess the impact of attitude and social norms on user selection of an interface design. 129–136. 4 indexed citations
18.
Howell, Michael J., Steve Love, & Mark Turner. (2004). The impact of interface metaphor and context of use on the usability of a speech-based mobile city guide service. Behaviour and Information Technology. 24(1). 67–78. 11 indexed citations
19.
Turner, Mark & Steve Love. (2003). Individual differences in user experience of head mounted displays: personality and visuo-spatial attention effects. The Science of The Total Environment. 760. 31–42. 2 indexed citations
20.
Taylor, Ian, Fergus McInnes, Steve Love, John Foster, & Mervyn Jack. (1998). Providing Animated Characters with Designated Personality Profiles. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026