Stephen Woodcock
- Ecology top 1%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Oceanography top 5%
- Pollution top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- William T. SloanThomas P. CurtisMary LunnIan M. HeadSean NeeChris GastDavid J. SuggettThomas Bell
- Topics
- Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (8 papers)Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (7 papers)Marine Biology and Ecology Research (4 papers)
- Cited by
- EcologyOceanographyPollution
- Journals
- Journal of NeuroscienceSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBioresource Technology
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Stephen Woodcock
34 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Ecology 1.3k
- Molecular Biology 822
- Oceanography 361
- Pollution 311
- Plant Science 241
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Woodcock
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Woodcock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Woodcock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Woodcock more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Woodcock
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Woodcock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Woodcock. The network helps show where Stephen Woodcock may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Woodcock
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Woodcock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Woodcock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Woodcock. Stephen Woodcock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 56 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 74 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 139 | |
| 17 | 79 | |
| 18 | 151 | |
| 19 | Quantifying the roles of immigration and chance in shaping prokaryote community structurebreakdown → | 1276 |
| 20 | 6 |
About Stephen Woodcock
Stephen Woodcock is a scholar working on Modeling and Simulation, Oceanography and Ecology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology (8 papers), Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies (7 papers) and Marine Biology and Ecology Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology (1.3k citations), Oceanography (361 citations) and Pollution (311 citations). Stephen Woodcock has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include William T. Sloan, Thomas P. Curtis, Mary Lunn, Ian M. Head, Sean Nee, Chris Gast, David J. Suggett, Thomas Bell, Patrick D. Schloss and Matthew R. Nitschke. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Bioresource Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.