Stephen Williams
- Soil Science top 2%
- Ecology top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Environmental Engineering top 10%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Keith PaustianMark EasterWilliam J. PartonCarlos Eduardo Pellegrino CerriStephen M. OgleRam GurungF. Jay BreidtMyron P. Gutmann
- Topics
- Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (25 papers)Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (10 papers)Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (7 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPLoS ONEThe Science of The Total Environment
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephen Williams
36 papers receiving 748 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Soil Science 479
- Ecology 181
- Global and Planetary Change 160
- Environmental Engineering 149
- Plant Science 146
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Williams. The network helps show where Stephen Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Williams. Stephen Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 20 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 49 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 47 | |
| 16 | Towards a standardized system for the reporting of carbon benefits in sustainable land management projects. | 9 |
| 17 | Simulating soil organic carbon in a rice-soybean-wheat-soybean chronosequence in Prairie County, Arkansas using the Century model | 10 |
| 18 | 48 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | User instructions GEFSOC Soil Carbon Modeling System | 1 |
About Stephen Williams
Stephen Williams is a scholar working on Soil Science, Environmental Chemistry and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 784 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (25 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (10 papers) and Soil Geostatistics and Mapping (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Soil Science (479 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (142 citations) and Environmental Chemistry (120 citations). Stephen Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Keith Paustian, Mark Easter, William J. Parton, Carlos Eduardo Pellegrino Cerri, Stephen M. Ogle, Ram Gurung, F. Jay Breidt, Myron P. Gutmann, Eleanor Milne and Melannie D. Hartman. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, PLoS ONE and The Science of The Total Environment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.