Stephen W. Santoro

4.6k total citations · 2 hit papers
26 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Stephen W. Santoro is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen W. Santoro has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Molecular Biology, 8 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 8 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Stephen W. Santoro's work include RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (9 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (8 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers). Stephen W. Santoro is often cited by papers focused on RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (9 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (8 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (6 papers). Stephen W. Santoro collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Israel. Stephen W. Santoro's co-authors include Gerald F. Joyce, Peter G. Schultz, David S. King, Lei Wang, Andrew B. Martin, Jason W. Chin, Catherine Dulac, J. Christopher Anderson, Kandasamy Sakthivel and Carlos F. Barbas and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Nucleic Acids Research.

In The Last Decade

Stephen W. Santoro

24 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Hit Papers

A general purpose RNA-cleaving DNA enzyme 1997 2026 2006 2016 1997 2002 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen W. Santoro United States 16 3.3k 460 436 344 221 26 3.7k
Indraneel Ghosh United States 31 2.7k 0.8× 168 0.4× 214 0.5× 454 1.3× 307 1.4× 64 3.5k
Toshihide Takeuchi Japan 34 4.3k 1.3× 684 1.5× 273 0.6× 428 1.2× 183 0.8× 62 5.4k
Isabel D. Alves France 33 2.3k 0.7× 170 0.4× 229 0.5× 177 0.5× 163 0.7× 86 2.9k
Horst Pick Switzerland 26 2.8k 0.9× 242 0.5× 583 1.3× 850 2.5× 604 2.7× 57 4.2k
Oded Tour Israel 7 2.3k 0.7× 330 0.7× 143 0.3× 249 0.7× 141 0.6× 9 3.1k
Stéphanie Cabantous France 22 2.9k 0.9× 581 1.3× 194 0.4× 222 0.6× 402 1.8× 44 3.8k
Paul Otto United States 9 3.4k 1.0× 265 0.6× 564 1.3× 553 1.6× 433 2.0× 17 4.4k
Gediminas Vidugiris United States 14 2.8k 0.9× 210 0.5× 505 1.2× 486 1.4× 333 1.5× 26 3.7k
Monika G. Wood United States 12 3.4k 1.0× 252 0.5× 668 1.5× 575 1.7× 425 1.9× 18 4.4k
Sandrine Sagan France 37 3.8k 1.2× 377 0.8× 213 0.5× 426 1.2× 143 0.6× 120 4.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen W. Santoro

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen W. Santoro's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen W. Santoro with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen W. Santoro more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen W. Santoro

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen W. Santoro. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen W. Santoro. The network helps show where Stephen W. Santoro may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen W. Santoro

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen W. Santoro. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen W. Santoro based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen W. Santoro. Stephen W. Santoro is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Santoro, Stephen W., et al.. (2024). The influence of olfactory experience on the birthrates of olfactory sensory neurons with specific odorant receptor identities. genesis. 62(3). e23611–e23611. 1 indexed citations
4.
Williams, Jasper Z., Dina Polyak, James Zhang, et al.. (2023). 323 Preclinical development of AB-1015, an integrated circuit T cell therapy containing an ALPG/MSLN logic gate and FAS/PTPN2 shRNA-miR, for the treatment of ovarian cancer. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. A367–A367. 1 indexed citations
5.
Santoro, Stephen W., et al.. (2023). A histological protocol for quantifying the birthrates of specific subtypes of olfactory sensory neurons in mice. STAR Protocols. 4(3). 102432–102432. 3 indexed citations
6.
Williams, Jasper Z., Joseph Choe, Maxim Sidorov, et al.. (2022). Abstract 2854: Logic gates controlled by priming receptors increase specificity and potency of CAR T cells. Cancer Research. 82(12_Supplement). 2854–2854. 1 indexed citations
7.
Gupta, Pooja, et al.. (2020). Olfactory Stimulation Regulates the Birth of Neurons That Express Specific Odorant Receptors. Cell Reports. 33(1). 108210–108210. 23 indexed citations
8.
Santoro, Stephen W. & Susanne Jakob. (2018). Gene expression profiling of the olfactory tissues of sex-separated and sex-combined female and male mice. Scientific Data. 5(1). 180260–180260. 11 indexed citations
9.
Jakob, Susanne, et al.. (2018). Sex separation induces differences in the olfactory sensory receptor repertoires of male and female mice. Nature Communications. 9(1). 5081–5081. 33 indexed citations
10.
Liu, Zhenyu, Amit Thakar, Stephen W. Santoro, & Kara G. Pratt. (2018). Presenilin Regulates Retinotectal Synapse Formation through EphB2 Receptor Processing. Developmental Neurobiology. 78(12). 1171–1190. 9 indexed citations
11.
Pérez, J., Nimrod D. Rubinstein, Daniel E. Fernandez, et al.. (2015). Quantitative and functional interrogation of parent-of-origin allelic expression biases in the brain. eLife. 4. e07860–e07860. 55 indexed citations
12.
Santoro, Stephen W. & Catherine Dulac. (2015). Histone variants and cellular plasticity. Trends in Genetics. 31(9). 516–527. 27 indexed citations
13.
Santoro, Stephen W. & Catherine Dulac. (2012). The activity-dependent histone variant H2BE modulates the life span of olfactory neurons. eLife. 1. e00070–e00070. 89 indexed citations
14.
Santoro, Stephen W., Hanne Volpin, Yoram Eyal, et al.. (2006). Site-specific recombination of asymmetric lox sites mediated by a heterotetrameric Cre recombinase complex. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry. 14(9). 3081–3089. 17 indexed citations
15.
16.
Santoro, Stephen W.. (2003). An archaebacteria-derived glutamyl-tRNA synthetase and tRNA pair for unnatural amino acid mutagenesis of proteins in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Research. 31(23). 6700–6709. 60 indexed citations
17.
Baldwin, Enoch P., Shelley S. Martin, Kathy A. Gelato, et al.. (2003). A Specificity Switch in Selected Cre Recombinase Variants Is Mediated by Macromolecular Plasticity and Water. Chemistry & Biology. 10(11). 1085–1094. 27 indexed citations
18.
Mehl, Ryan A., J. Christopher Anderson, Stephen W. Santoro, et al.. (2003). Generation of a Bacterium with a 21 Amino Acid Genetic Code. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 125(4). 935–939. 221 indexed citations
19.
Santoro, Stephen W., Lei Wang, Brad Herberich, David S. King, & Peter G. Schultz. (2002). An efficient system for the evolution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase specificity. Nature Biotechnology. 20(10). 1044–1048. 165 indexed citations
20.
Santoro, Stephen W. & Gerald F. Joyce. (1998). Mechanism and Utility of an RNA-Cleaving DNA Enzyme. Biochemistry. 37(38). 13330–13342. 376 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026