Stephen Thew
Impact in
-
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Peripheral Artery Disease Management
- Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
-
- Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Papers in
- Surgery 4
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics 4
-
- Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes 1
- Co-authors
- Susie Kim (2 shared papers)Cam Nguyen (2 shared papers)Gary L. Schaer (2 shared papers)James C.H. Chu (2 shared papers)R. Jeffrey Snell (2 shared papers)Sandeep Nathan (2 shared papers)Clifford J. Kavinsky (1 shared paper)Lloyd W. Klein (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions (1 paper)The American Journal of Gastroenterology (1 paper)PubMed (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Stephen Thew
4 papers receiving 64 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Surgery 52
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 21
- Internal Medicine 2
- Nephrology 4
- Immunology and Allergy 3
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Thew
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Thew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Thew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Thew more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Thew
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Thew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Thew. The network helps show where Stephen Thew may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Thew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 46 | |
| 2 | 2001 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 5 | Report of an undeployed stent causing the unraveling of a coronary artery guidewire being used for sidebranch protection. | 2002 | 0 |
About Stephen Thew
Stephen Thew is a scholar working on Surgery, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 5 papers that have together received 66 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (4 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (1 paper), Vascular Procedures and Complications (1 paper), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (1 paper), Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances (1 paper), Coronary Artery Anomalies (1 paper), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (1 paper) and Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Surgery (52 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (21 citations), Internal Medicine (2 citations), Nephrology (4 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (3 citations). Stephen Thew has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Susie Kim, Cam Nguyen, Gary L. Schaer, James C.H. Chu, R. Jeffrey Snell, Sandeep Nathan, Clifford J. Kavinsky, Lloyd W. Klein and Peter Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, The American Journal of Gastroenterology and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.