Stephen R. Grimm

69 total papers · 1.9k total citations
30 papers, 645 citations indexed

About

Stephen R. Grimm is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen R. Grimm has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 645 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Philosophy, 8 papers in History and Philosophy of Science and 8 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Stephen R. Grimm's work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (14 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers). Stephen R. Grimm is often cited by papers focused on Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (14 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers) and Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers). Stephen R. Grimm collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Stephen R. Grimm's co-authors include Itzhak Brook, Michael R. DePaul, Kristoffer Ahlstrom‐Vij, Eranda Jayawickreme, Michel Ferrari, Julia Staffel, Laura E. R. Blackie and Igor Grossmann and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Endodontics, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Philosophical Studies.

In The Last Decade

Stephen R. Grimm

26 papers receiving 549 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Stephen R. Grimm 390 203 187 125 112 30 645
Rani Lill Anjum 221 0.6× 163 0.8× 160 0.9× 90 0.7× 69 0.6× 40 638
Lara Buchak 405 1.0× 80 0.4× 114 0.6× 199 1.6× 134 1.2× 28 660
Lucy Allais 343 0.9× 108 0.5× 180 1.0× 83 0.7× 100 0.9× 36 590
Michael R. DePaul 457 1.2× 95 0.5× 229 1.2× 214 1.7× 70 0.6× 25 590
Richmond Campbell 120 0.3× 54 0.3× 52 0.3× 177 1.4× 152 1.4× 32 607
Alison Hills 478 1.2× 80 0.4× 123 0.7× 323 2.6× 91 0.8× 30 654
Stephen Finlay 507 1.3× 19 0.1× 175 0.9× 338 2.7× 51 0.5× 32 681
Max Kölbel 525 1.3× 144 0.7× 442 2.4× 136 1.1× 57 0.5× 30 722
John Hyman 413 1.1× 75 0.4× 303 1.6× 302 2.4× 61 0.5× 47 656
Edward Erwin 262 0.7× 96 0.5× 79 0.4× 90 0.7× 64 0.6× 41 772

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen R. Grimm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen R. Grimm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen R. Grimm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen R. Grimm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen R. Grimm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen R. Grimm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen R. Grimm. The network helps show where Stephen R. Grimm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen R. Grimm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen R. Grimm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen R. Grimm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen R. Grimm. Stephen R. Grimm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026