Stephen Osmon

755 total citations
10 papers, 568 citations indexed

About

Stephen Osmon is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Osmon has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 568 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Epidemiology, 2 papers in Infectious Diseases and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Stephen Osmon's work include Poisoning and overdose treatments (2 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (2 papers). Stephen Osmon is often cited by papers focused on Poisoning and overdose treatments (2 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers) and Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (2 papers). Stephen Osmon collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Stephen Osmon's co-authors include Marin H. Kollef, Victoria J. Fraser, Richard S. Hotchkiss, Katherine Chang, Craig M. Coopersmith, Tracey H. Wagner, Irene E. Karl, Suzanne M. Ward, W. Claiborne Dunagan and Donna Prentice and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Immunology, CHEST Journal and Critical Care Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Osmon

8 papers receiving 554 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stephen Osmon United States	6	202	170	119	107	73	10	568
Vassilios Koussoulas Greece	11	184 0.9×	147 0.9×	93 0.8×	9 0.1×	62 0.8×	16	537
Zainab Al Alawi Saudi Arabia	13	96 0.5×	117 0.7×	100 0.8×	20 0.2×	40 0.5×	17	605
John Macfie United Kingdom	11	104 0.5×	53 0.3×	308 2.6×	43 0.4×	105 1.4×	13	916
I Mimica Brazil	13	221 1.1×	46 0.3×	52 0.4×	48 0.4×	59 0.8×	41	643
Jennifer R. DeFazio United States	12	83 0.4×	34 0.2×	270 2.3×	20 0.2×	68 0.9×	28	701
A. van’t Veen Netherlands	13	127 0.6×	20 0.1×	40 0.3×	22 0.2×	61 0.8×	26	494
Bin Du China	11	196 1.0×	64 0.4×	59 0.5×	12 0.1×	102 1.4×	35	606
Angela Saviano Italy	16	155 0.8×	55 0.3×	231 1.9×	12 0.1×	86 1.2×	58	783
Lisa Lubsch United States	10	172 0.9×	19 0.1×	109 0.9×	35 0.3×	34 0.5×	17	840
Erika Parmentier-Decrucq France	12	193 1.0×	143 0.8×	116 1.0×	48 0.4×	87 1.2×	33	751

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Osmon

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Osmon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Osmon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Osmon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Osmon

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Osmon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Osmon. The network helps show where Stephen Osmon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Osmon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Osmon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Osmon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Osmon. Stephen Osmon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Rampon, Garrett, et al.. (2021). Fomepizole as an adjunct in acetylcysteine treated acetaminophen overdose patients: a case series. Clinical Toxicology. 60(4). 472–477. 17 indexed citations

2.

Henke, Jonathan, et al.. (2020). Effect of Very Low-Dose Hydrocortisone on Shock Reversal in Patients With Septic Shock. Critical Care Explorations. 2(4). e0096–e0096. 1 indexed citations

3.

Charbek, Edward, et al.. (2019). Unusual Case of Herpes Simplex Virus Pneumonia in Immunocompetent Patient. A5205–A5205.

4.

Osmon, Stephen, et al.. (2019). A CASE OF DAPSONE-INDUCED METHEMOGLOBINEMIA. CHEST Journal. 156(4). A2115–A2115. 1 indexed citations

5.

Rampon, Garrett, et al.. (2019). Use of fomepizole as an adjunct in the treatment of acetaminophen overdose: a case series. 4(1). 1–4. 20 indexed citations

6.

Osmon, Stephen, et al.. (2019). Cryptococcal Meningitis: A Complication of Sarcoidosis. A1532–A1532.

7.

Hotchkiss, Richard S., Stephen Osmon, Katherine Chang, et al.. (2005). Accelerated Lymphocyte Death in Sepsis Occurs by both the Death Receptor and Mitochondrial Pathways. The Journal of Immunology. 174(8). 5110–5118. 271 indexed citations

8.

Osmon, Stephen & Marin H. Kollef. (2005). Prevention of Pneumonia in the Hospital Setting. Clinics in Chest Medicine. 26(1). 135–142. 5 indexed citations

9.

Osmon, Stephen, et al.. (2004). Reporting of medical errors: An intensive care unit experience. Critical Care Medicine. 32(3). 727–733. 119 indexed citations

10.

Osmon, Stephen, Suzanne M. Ward, Victoria J. Fraser, & Marin H. Kollef. (2004). Hospital Mortality for Patients With Bacteremia Due to Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa. CHEST Journal. 125(2). 607–616. 134 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact