Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Noffsinger
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Noffsinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Noffsinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Noffsinger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Noffsinger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Noffsinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Noffsinger. The network helps show where Stephen Noffsinger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Noffsinger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Noffsinger.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Noffsinger based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Noffsinger. Stephen Noffsinger is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Noffsinger, Stephen, et al.. (2018). Determining Intellectual Disability for Capital Defendants. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law online/The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 46(4). 549–552.3 indexed citations
Noffsinger, Stephen, et al.. (2017). Standard of Appellate Review for Postconviction Relief of Intellectually Disabled Defendant's Competency to Plead. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law online/The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 45(4). 501–503.
6.
Noffsinger, Stephen, et al.. (2015). Determining Intellectual Disability in a Post-Atkins Death Penalty Case. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law online/The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 43(4). 526–529.1 indexed citations
7.
Noffsinger, Stephen, et al.. (2013). Competency to Proceed Pro Se. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law online/The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 41(4). 583–585.1 indexed citations
8.
Noffsinger, Stephen, et al.. (2012). Standard for Proving That a Prisoner Is Mentally Incapable of Filing a Timely Habeas Corpus Petition. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law online/The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 40(4). 566–567.1 indexed citations
9.
Noffsinger, Stephen, et al.. (2009). Absolute Right to Privacy for Prison Inmates. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law online/The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 37(4). 563–565.1 indexed citations
10.
Budur, Kumar, et al.. (2008). Sexual Behavior during Sleep: Convenient Alibi or Parasomnia; 'Sexsomnia' Disrupts Sleep, Threatens Relationships, and Has Forensic Implications. Current psychiatry. 7(7). 21.1 indexed citations
11.
Friedman, Susan Hatters, et al.. (2005). Filicide-suicide: common factors in parents who kill their children and themselves.. PubMed. 33(4). 496–504.124 indexed citations
Buckley, P.F., Stephen Noffsinger, Douglas A. Smith, Debra R. Hrouda, & James L. Knoll. (2003). Treatment of the psychotic patient who is violent. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 26(1). 231–272.40 indexed citations
Noffsinger, Stephen. (2001). Restoration to Competency Practice Guidelines. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 45(3). 356–362.21 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.