Countries citing papers authored by Stephen M. Feldman
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen M. Feldman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen M. Feldman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen M. Feldman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen M. Feldman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen M. Feldman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen M. Feldman. The network helps show where Stephen M. Feldman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen M. Feldman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen M. Feldman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen M. Feldman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen M. Feldman. Stephen M. Feldman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (2020). Court-Packing Time? Supreme Court Legitimacy and Positivity Theory. Buffalo law review. 68(5). 1519.1 indexed citations
2.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (2019). Free-Speech Formalism and Social Injustice. 26(1). 47.
3.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (2017). Postmodern Free Expression: A Philosophical Rationale for the Digital Age. Marquette law review. 100(4). 1123.1 indexed citations
4.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (2015). (Same) Sex, Lies, and Democracy: Tradition, Religion, and Substantive Due Process (With an Emphasis on Obergefell v. Hodges). eYLS (Yale Law School). 24(2). 341.1 indexed citations
5.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (2012). Democracy and Dissent: Strauss, Arendt, and Voegelin in America. Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver). 89(3). 671.
6.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (2010). Modernity, Religion, and the Public Sphere. eYLS (Yale Law School). 45(4). 845–854.
7.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (2006). Empiricism, Religion, and Judicial Decision-Making. eYLS (Yale Law School). 15(1). 43.6 indexed citations
Feldman, Stephen M.. (2004). The Transformation of an Academic Discipline: Law Professors in the Past and Future (or Toy Story Too). Journal of legal education. 54.2 indexed citations
10.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (2003). Religious Minorities and the First Amendment: The History, the Doctrine, and the Future. eYLS (Yale Law School). 6(2). 222.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (2001). An Arrow to the Heart: The Love and Death of Postmodern Legal Scholarship. Vanderbilt law review. 54(6). 2349.1 indexed citations
13.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (2000). How to Be Critical. Chicago-Kent law review. 76(2). 893.5 indexed citations
14.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (2000). Made for each other. Philosophy & Social Criticism. 26(1). 51–70.17 indexed citations
Feldman, Stephen M.. (1996). Principle, History, and Power: The Limits of the First Amendment Religion Clauses. Iowa law review. 81.1 indexed citations
17.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (1993). The Persistence of Power and the Struggle for Dialogic Standards in Postmodern Constitutional Jurisprudence: Michelman, Habermas, and Civic Republicanism. The Georgetown law journal. 81. 2243.3 indexed citations
18.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (1992). Whose Common Good? Racism in the Political Community. The Georgetown law journal. 80.2 indexed citations
19.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (1992). Republican Revival/Interpretive Turn. eYLS (Yale Law School). 1992.
20.
Feldman, Stephen M.. (1986). Felix S. Cohen and His Jurisprudence: Reflections on Federal Indian Law. Buffalo law review. 35. 479.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.