Stephen Leach

438 total citations
13 papers, 26 citations indexed

About

Stephen Leach is a scholar working on History, History and Philosophy of Science and Anthropology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Leach has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 26 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in History, 3 papers in History and Philosophy of Science and 3 papers in Anthropology. Recurrent topics in Stephen Leach's work include Philosophy, History, and Historiography (4 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers). Stephen Leach is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy, History, and Historiography (4 papers), History of Science and Natural History (2 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers). Stephen Leach collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Stephen Leach's co-authors include James Tartaglia, Richard Rorty, H.S. Torrens, Peter Johnson, Giuseppina D’Oro and James Connelly and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Antiquaries Journal and International Journal of Philosophical Studies.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Leach

10 papers receiving 22 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stephen Leach United Kingdom	3	13	8	5	4	3	13	26
John Lubbock	3	8 0.6×	7 0.9×		4 1.0×	3 1.0×	12	32
William Ashton Ellis	4	7 0.5×	10 1.3×		2 0.5×	2 0.7×	6	37
Ulrich Gaier United States	5	15 1.2×	8 1.0×		3 0.8×	6 2.0×	32	63
Salomon Reinach	2	5 0.4×	7 0.9×		2 0.5×	3 1.0×	9	28
Monier Monier-Williams United Kingdom	3	13 1.0×	5 0.6×		3 0.8×		13	28
A. Seth Pringle-Pattison	2	6 0.5×	8 1.0×		4 1.0×	2 0.7×	7	15
Guido Alliney Italy	3	33 2.5×	4 0.5×		5 1.3×	5 1.7×	19	39
Mark Halliday United States	3	9 0.7×	3 0.4×		4 1.0×	3 1.0×	5	33
Michael Scheffel Germany	5	5 0.4×	9 1.1×		2 0.5×		14	52
Seamus Perry United Kingdom	3	6 0.5×	10 1.3×		2 0.5×	4 1.3×	16	65

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Leach

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Leach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Leach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Leach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Leach

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Leach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Leach. The network helps show where Stephen Leach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Leach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Leach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Leach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Leach. Stephen Leach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Leach, Stephen & H.S. Torrens. (2022). George Perry (1771–1823): architect and naturalist. Archives of Natural History. 49(1). 117–129. 2 indexed citations

2.

Leach, Stephen & H.S. Torrens. (2022). George Perry (c.1718–1771): industrialist, cartographer and naturalist. Archives of Natural History. 49(1). 102–116.

3.

Leach, Stephen. (2022). Free will: An impossible reality or an incoherent concept?. Human Affairs. 32(4). 413–419.

4.

Leach, Stephen. (2020). Chadbourne Gilpatric and Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Fateful Meeting. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9. 1 indexed citations

5.

Leach, Stephen. (2019). KING ARTHUR’S ROUND TABLE REVISITED: A REVIEW OF TWO RIVAL INTERPRETATIONS OF A HENGE MONUMENT NEAR PENRITH, IN CUMBRIA. The Antiquaries Journal. 99. 417–434. 1 indexed citations

6.

D’Oro, Giuseppina, et al.. (2018). Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology. Keele Research Repository (Keele University). 2 indexed citations

7.

Leach, Stephen. (2016). Philosophy in a Meaningless Life: A System of Nihilism, Consciousness and Reality. International Journal of Philosophical Studies. 24(2). 280–283. 8 indexed citations

8.

Connelly, James, Peter Johnson, & Stephen Leach. (2014). R. G. Collingwood: A Research Companion. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks. 2 indexed citations

9.

Rorty, Richard, Stephen Leach, & James Tartaglia. (2014). Mind, Language, and Metaphilosophy: Early Philosophical Papers. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 3 indexed citations

10.

Leach, Stephen. (2013). Pyrrhonian Skepticism and the Mirror of Nature. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy. 27(4). 388–401. 1 indexed citations

11.

Leach, Stephen. (2011). History, Ethics and Philosophy: Bernard Williams’ Appraisal of R. G. Collingwood. Journal of the Philosophy of History. 5(1). 36–53.

12.

Leach, Stephen. (2011). Evaluating the Representation of Violence in David Cronenberg's A History of Violence. 2(1). 13–20. 1 indexed citations

13.

Leach, Stephen. (2009). An Appreciation of R. G. Collingwood as an Archaeologist. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 19(1). 14–14. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact