Stephen L. Esquith
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Public Administration top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Ezra N. SuleimanFred GiffordTracy Beedy
- Topics
- Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers)Human Rights and Development (3 papers)International Development and Aid (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Public AdministrationPolitical Science and International RelationsSociology and Political Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesMalawiMali
In The Last Decade
Stephen L. Esquith
20 papers receiving 286 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Sociology and Political Science 158
- Political Science and International Relations 121
- Education 79
- Public Administration 49
- Strategy and Management 24
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen L. Esquith
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen L. Esquith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen L. Esquith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen L. Esquith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen L. Esquith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen L. Esquith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen L. Esquith. The network helps show where Stephen L. Esquith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen L. Esquith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen L. Esquith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen L. Esquith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen L. Esquith. Stephen L. Esquith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Capabilities, power, and institutions : toward a more critical development ethics | 15 |
| 8 | The Political Responsibilities of Everyday Bystanders | 8 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 121 | |
| 11 | 112 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Stephen L. Esquith
Stephen L. Esquith is a scholar working on Development, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 329 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 papers), Human Rights and Development (3 papers) and International Development and Aid (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (49 citations), Political Science and International Relations (121 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (158 citations). Stephen L. Esquith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malawi and Mali. Frequent co-authors include Ezra N. Suleiman, Fred Gifford and Tracy Beedy. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Perspectives on Politics and Theory and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.