Stephen Kahn

2.1k citations
9 papers · 1.5k · 1 hit paper · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Kahn

9 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Stephen Kahn's Hit Papers

Hardiness and health: A prospective study. 1982 · 1.3k citations
1.3k0+14+29Years since publication4008001.2k

Peers

Stephen Kahn
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Applied Psychology 243
  • Clinical Psychology 842
  • Social Psychology 486
  • General Health Professions 471
  • Leadership and Management 21
Replace James H. Amirkhan with:
James H. Amirkhan United States
Shonali Sud India
Robert King Australia
Kimberly Wallace United States
Jeffrey Altman United States
Raquel Rodríguez‐Carvajal Spain
Carlos P. Zalaquett United States
Toni L. Bisconti United States
Anastassios Stalikas Greece
Andrew J. Shatté United States
Stephen Kahn relative to James H. Amirkhan United States James H. Amirkhan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
James H. Amirkhan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Kahn

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Kahn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Kahn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Kahn more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Kahn

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Kahn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Kahn. The network helps show where Stephen Kahn may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Kahn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Kahn Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Kahn links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Hardiness and health: A prospective study.
Hit paper breakdown →
19821255
2 1998124
3 198473
4
Self-Hypnosis: The Chicago Paradigm
199014
5 19899
6 19915
7 19885
8 19904
9 20031

About Stephen Kahn

Stephen Kahn is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (5 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Neurology and Historical Studies (1 paper), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (1 paper) and Health and Well-being Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (243 citations), Clinical Psychology (842 citations), Social Psychology (486 citations), General Health Professions (471 citations) and Leadership and Management (21 citations). Stephen Kahn has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Salvatore R. Maddi, Suzanne C. Kobasa, Teresa M. Amabile and Erika Fromm. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Consulting psychology journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact