Countries citing papers authored by Stephen J. Pomeranz
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen J. Pomeranz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen J. Pomeranz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen J. Pomeranz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen J. Pomeranz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen J. Pomeranz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen J. Pomeranz. The network helps show where Stephen J. Pomeranz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen J. Pomeranz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen J. Pomeranz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen J. Pomeranz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen J. Pomeranz. Stephen J. Pomeranz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ersoy, Hale & Stephen J. Pomeranz. (2016). 2016. Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances. 25(2).1 indexed citations
2.
Pomeranz, Stephen J., et al.. (2015). 2015. Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances. 24(2).1 indexed citations
3.
Pomeranz, Stephen J., et al.. (2015). 2015. Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances. 24(3).2 indexed citations
4.
Ersoy, Hale & Stephen J. Pomeranz. (2015). Palmer Classification and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings of Ulnocarpal Impingement.. PubMed. 24(4). 257–62.3 indexed citations
5.
Ersoy, Hale, et al.. (2015). 2015. Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances. 24(1).1 indexed citations
6.
Pomeranz, Stephen J., et al.. (2014). Adhesive Capsulitis. Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances. 23(2). 119–121.2 indexed citations
Hasso, Anton N., Burton P. Drayer, R. E. Anderson, et al.. (2000). Vertigo and hearing loss. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.. PubMed. 215 Suppl. 471–8.11 indexed citations
9.
Hasso, Anton N., Burton P. Drayer, R. E. Anderson, et al.. (2000). Orbits, vision, and visual loss. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.. PubMed. 215 Suppl. 579–87.4 indexed citations
10.
Anderson, R. E., Burton P. Drayer, B. Braffman, et al.. (2000). Acute low back pain--radiculopathy. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.. PubMed. 215 Suppl. 479–85.7 indexed citations
11.
Braffman, B., Burton P. Drayer, R. E. Anderson, et al.. (2000). Dementia. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.. PubMed. 215 Suppl. 525–33.3 indexed citations
12.
Tanenbaum, Lawrence, Burton P. Drayer, R. E. Anderson, et al.. (2000). Epilepsy. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria.. PubMed. 215 Suppl. 459–70.2 indexed citations
Shoshan, Yigal, E. Gross, P. Cohen, & Stephen J. Pomeranz. (1996). "Acute appendicitis" of neurosurgical origin.. PubMed. 162(4). 343–5.5 indexed citations
Pomeranz, Stephen J.. (1989). Craniospinal magnetic resonance imaging. Saunders eBooks.15 indexed citations
18.
Pomeranz, Stephen J., et al.. (1987). MR of visual pathways in patients with neurofibromatosis.. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 8(5). 831–6.8 indexed citations
19.
Pomeranz, Stephen J. & Anthony V. Proto. (1986). Histiocytosis X. CHEST Journal. 89(1). 88–92.19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.