Stephen Inglis

469 citations
16 papers · 294 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Inglis

16 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers

Stephen Inglis
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Condensed Matter Physics 151
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 95
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 234
  • Computational Mathematics 2
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 8
Replace Adam Rançon with:
Adam Rançon France
Clément Hainaut France
Loïc Herviou France
Kilian Sandholzer Switzerland
Alexander Rietzler Austria
E. Carlo Samson United States
Andrea Richaud Italy
R. G. Scott United Kingdom
Wen-Yuan Liu China
Stephen Inglis relative to Adam Rançon France Adam Rançon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Adam Rançon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Inglis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Inglis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Inglis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Inglis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Inglis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Inglis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Inglis. The network helps show where Stephen Inglis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 21 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Inglis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Inglis Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Inglis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 201338
2 201635
3 201433
4 201332
5 201531
6 201328
7 201120
8 201418
9 201012
10 200212
11 200910
12 201210
13 20147
14 20164
15 20163
16
Mott Insulators in a Fully-Frustrated Bose Hubbard Model on the Honeycomb Lattice
20161

About Stephen Inglis

Stephen Inglis is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Computational Mechanics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 294 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum many-body systems (12 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (7 papers), Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (4 papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (3 papers), Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (3 papers), Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics (2 papers) and Model Reduction and Neural Networks (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (151 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (95 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (234 citations), Computational Mathematics (2 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (8 citations). Stephen Inglis has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roger G. Melko, Lode Pollet, Chris M. Herdman, Jason Iaconis, Ann B. Kallin, Adrian Del Maestro, Pierre–Nicholas Roy, Jean-Marie Stéphan, Paul Fendley and Hans De Sterck. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review B, Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications, Computers & Graphics and New Journal of Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact