Stephen Inglis

453 total citations
15 papers, 291 citations indexed

About

Stephen Inglis is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Inglis has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 291 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 9 papers in Condensed Matter Physics and 6 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics. Recurrent topics in Stephen Inglis's work include Quantum many-body systems (12 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers). Stephen Inglis is often cited by papers focused on Quantum many-body systems (12 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (6 papers) and Theoretical and Computational Physics (5 papers). Stephen Inglis collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Germany and United States. Stephen Inglis's co-authors include Roger G. Melko, Lode Pollet, Chris M. Herdman, Ann B. Kallin, Pierre–Nicholas Roy, Adrian Del Maestro, Paul Fendley, Jean-Marie Stéphan, Craig S. Kaplan and John G. Cleary and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nature Communications and Physical Review B.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Inglis

15 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

Stephen Inglis
Stephen Inglis
Citations per year, relative to Stephen Inglis Stephen Inglis (= 1×) peers Adam Rançon

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Inglis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Inglis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Inglis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Inglis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Inglis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Inglis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Inglis. The network helps show where Stephen Inglis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Inglis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Inglis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Inglis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Inglis. Stephen Inglis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Inglis, Stephen & Lode Pollet. (2016). Accessing Many-Body Localized States through the Generalized Gibbs Ensemble. Physical Review Letters. 117(12). 120402–120402. 35 indexed citations
2.
Alba, Vincenzo, Stephen Inglis, & Lode Pollet. (2016). Classical mutual information in mean-field spin glass models. Physical review. B.. 93(9). 3 indexed citations
3.
Mandal, Ipsita, Stephen Inglis, & Roger G. Melko. (2016). Geometrical mutual information at the tricritical point of the two-dimensional Blume–Capel model. Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment. 2016(7). 73105–73105. 4 indexed citations
4.
Herdman, Chris M., et al.. (2015). Detecting Goldstone modes with entanglement entropy. Physical Review B. 92(11). 30 indexed citations
5.
Herdman, Chris M., Stephen Inglis, Pierre–Nicholas Roy, Roger G. Melko, & Adrian Del Maestro. (2014). Path-integral Monte Carlo method for Rényi entanglement entropies. Physical Review E. 90(1). 13308–13308. 34 indexed citations
6.
Hao, Zhihao, Stephen Inglis, & Roger G. Melko. (2014). Destroying a topological quantum bit by condensing Ising vortices. Nature Communications. 5(1). 5781–5781. 7 indexed citations
7.
Stéphan, Jean-Marie, Stephen Inglis, Paul Fendley, & Roger G. Melko. (2014). Geometric Mutual Information at Classical Critical Points. Physical Review Letters. 112(12). 18 indexed citations
8.
Inglis, Stephen & Roger G. Melko. (2013). Wang-Landau method for calculating Rényi entropies in finite-temperature quantum Monte Carlo simulations. Physical Review E. 87(1). 32 indexed citations
9.
Inglis, Stephen & Roger G. Melko. (2013). Entanglement at a two-dimensional quantum critical point: aT= 0 projector quantum Monte Carlo study. New Journal of Physics. 15(7). 73048–73048. 27 indexed citations
10.
Inglis, Stephen, et al.. (2013). Detecting classical phase transitions with Renyi mutual information. Physical Review B. 87(19). 38 indexed citations
11.
Inglis, Stephen, et al.. (2012). Op Art rendering with lines and curves. Computers & Graphics. 36(6). 607–621. 10 indexed citations
12.
Inglis, Stephen, et al.. (2011). Quantum spin liquid in a spin-12XYmodel with four-site exchange on the kagome lattice. Physical Review B. 84(13). 20 indexed citations
13.
Tam, Ka-Ming, Scott Geraedts, Stephen Inglis, Michel J. P. Gingras, & Roger G. Melko. (2010). Superglass Phase of Interacting Bosons. Physical Review Letters. 104(21). 215301–215301. 12 indexed citations
14.
Andrews, Shawn, Hans De Sterck, Stephen Inglis, & Roger G. Melko. (2009). Monte Carlo study of degenerate ground states and residual entropy in a frustrated honeycomb lattice Ising model. Physical Review E. 79(4). 41127–41127. 9 indexed citations
15.
Teahan, William J., Stephen Inglis, John G. Cleary, & Geoffrey Holmes. (2002). Correcting English text using PPM models. 289–298. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026