Stephen Griew

442 citations
23 papers · 332 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Griew

17 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers

Stephen Griew
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 14
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 156
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 76
  • General Decision Sciences 11
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 57
Replace Vicky E. Coon with:
Vicky E. Coon United States
Donna La Voie United States
Timothy A. Salthouse United States
Holly E. Hancock United States
Juan J. Ortells Spain
Carson Y. Nolan United States
Kyle T. Gagnon United States
Jerry G. Ells Canada
Dominic A. Simon United States
Eugene C. Lechelt Canada
Stephen Griew relative to Vicky E. Coon United States Vicky E. Coon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Vicky E. Coon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Griew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Griew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Griew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Griew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Griew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Griew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Griew. The network helps show where Stephen Griew may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Griew, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Griew Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Griew links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1958229
2 195916
3 196312
4 196210
5 196410
6 19589
7 19589
8 19587
9 19596
10 19605
11 19634
12 19724
13 19633
14 19683
15 20091
16
Job re-design : the application of biological data on ageing to the design of equipment and the organisation of work
19641
17 19801
18 19621
19 19681
20 20090

About Stephen Griew

Stephen Griew is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Speech and Hearing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 23 papers that have together received 332 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Interactive and Immersive Displays (2 papers), Noise Effects and Management (2 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (2 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring (1 paper), Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods (1 paper) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (14 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (156 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (76 citations), General Decision Sciences (11 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (57 citations). Stephen Griew has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Canada. Frequent co-authors include A. T. Welford, D. R. Davies, Richard Lynn, Liza O’Donnell, Andrew Treacher, BRIAN J. FELLOWS, Ray Over and Arthur P. Sanford. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Ergonomics, Acta Psychologica, British Journal of Sociology and Journal of Applied Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact