Stephen Fricker
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Infectious Diseases
- Ecological Modeling top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Ecology
- Co-authors
- Craig WilliamsRichard R. WilliamsBrenton LaddJosé M. FacelliCameron WebbKatherine L. BaldockAndrew S. FliesPhilip Weinstein
- Topics
- Mosquito-borne diseases and control (11 papers)Viral Infections and Vectors (5 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Ecological ModelingPublic Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthNature and Landscape Conservation
- Journals
- The Science of The Total EnvironmentPLoS PathogensInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Stephen Fricker
13 papers receiving 256 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 147
- Infectious Diseases 88
- Ecological Modeling 62
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 59
- Ecology 55
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Fricker
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Fricker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Fricker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Fricker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Fricker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Fricker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Fricker. The network helps show where Stephen Fricker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Fricker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Fricker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Fricker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Fricker. Stephen Fricker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 51 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 21 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 68 |
About Stephen Fricker
Stephen Fricker is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Infectious Diseases, having authored 14 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mosquito-borne diseases and control (11 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (5 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (62 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (147 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (59 citations). Stephen Fricker has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Craig Williams, Richard R. Williams, Brenton Ladd, José M. Facelli, Cameron Webb, Katherine L. Baldock, Andrew S. Flies, Philip Weinstein, Emily J. Flies and Emily Johnston. Their work appears in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, PLoS Pathogens and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.