Stephen Danczyk

1.4k citations
64 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Danczyk

63 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Stephen Danczyk
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
  • Aerospace Engineering 260
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 174
  • Spectroscopy 110
  • Computational Mechanics 135
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 32
Replace И. В. Кочетов with:
И. В. Кочетов Russia
Katsunori Muraoka Japan
Reed J. Jensen United States
E.H.A. Granneman Netherlands
H. F. Döbele Germany
Paolo Chiggiato Switzerland
J. H. Whealton United States
John R. Hiskes United States
Κ. Freitag Germany
S. P. Jamison United Kingdom
Stephen Danczyk relative to И. В. Кочетов Russia И. В. Кочетов's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
И. В. Кочетов · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Danczyk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Danczyk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Danczyk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Danczyk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Danczyk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Danczyk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Danczyk. The network helps show where Stephen Danczyk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Danczyk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Danczyk Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Danczyk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009164
2 2012104
3 202084
4 201867
5 199652
6 200848
7 202046
8 202140
9 199736
10 199931
11 200128
12 202128
13 201227
14 202025
15 201122
16 201920
17 199918
18 199717
19 201917
20 202017

About Stephen Danczyk

Stephen Danczyk is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Spectroscopy, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and Detonation Processes (10 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (9 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (7 papers), Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer (7 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (5 papers), Chemical and Physical Properties of Materials (2 papers), Combustion and flame dynamics (2 papers) and Energetic Materials and Combustion (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aerospace Engineering (260 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (174 citations), Spectroscopy (110 citations), Computational Mechanics (135 citations) and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (32 citations). Stephen Danczyk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include William A. Hargus, John W. Bennewitz, Blaine R. Bigler, Stephen A. Schumaker, Jabari O. Farrar, Terrence R. Meyer, Richard B. Kaner, Scott Gilje, Sergey Dubin and Sukesh Roy. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review C, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Applied Physics B, Nuclear Physics A and Combustion and Flame.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact