Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen D. Krasner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen D. Krasner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen D. Krasner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen D. Krasner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen D. Krasner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen D. Krasner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen D. Krasner. The network helps show where Stephen D. Krasner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen D. Krasner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen D. Krasner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen D. Krasner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen D. Krasner. Stephen D. Krasner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Krasner, Stephen D., et al.. (2018). Civil Wars & Global Disorder: Threats & Opportunities. Daedalus.1 indexed citations
3.
Goldstein, Judith L. & Stephen D. Krasner. (2016). Unfair Trade Practices: The Case for a Differential Response. American Economic Review. 74(2). 282–287.2 indexed citations
Krasner, Stephen D., et al.. (2012). Tough Talk Is Cheap. Foreign Affairs.
7.
Krasner, Stephen D.. (2011). Talking Tough to Pakistan. Foreign Affairs. 90.3 indexed citations
8.
Krasner, Stephen D.. (2011). International Support for State-Building: Flawed Consensus. 2(3).2 indexed citations
9.
Krasner, Stephen D.. (2010). An Orienting Principle for Foreign Policy. Policy review. 3.6 indexed citations
10.
Krasner, Stephen D.. (2009). Who Gets a State, and Why?. Foreign Affairs.5 indexed citations
11.
Krasner, Stephen D. & Carlos Pascual. (2005). Para remediar la ingobernabilidad de los estados. 5(4). 91–103.
12.
Krasner, Stephen D.. (2005). The Day After. Foreign Policy. 146.3 indexed citations
13.
Krasner, Stephen D.. (2004). The Hole in the Whole: Sovereignty, Shared Sovereignty, and International Law. Michigan Journal of International Law. 25(4). 1075–1101.17 indexed citations
Krasner, Stephen D.. (2000). International Law and International Relations: Together, Apart, Together?. Chicago journal of international law. 1(1). 10.4 indexed citations
16.
Krasner, Stephen D.. (2000). Power and Constraint. Chicago journal of international law. 1(2). 4.6 indexed citations
17.
Katzenstein, Peter J., Robert O. Keohane, & Stephen D. Krasner. (1999). Exploration And Contestation In The Study Of World Politics. Swarthmore College Works (Swarthmore College Libraries).76 indexed citations
18.
Krasner, Stephen D.. (1997). Pervasive Not Perverse: Semi-Sovereigns as the Global Norm. Cornell international law journal. 30(3). 651–680.7 indexed citations
19.
Risse, Thomas, David R. Cameron, Peter J. Katzenstein, et al.. (1995). Bringing Transnational Relations Back In. Cambridge University Press eBooks.506 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.