Stephen Crowley

751 citations
23 papers · 416 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Crowley

21 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Stephen Crowley
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Public Administration 166
  • Political Science and International Relations 321
  • Urban Studies 22
  • Sociology and Political Science 154
  • General Health Professions 69
Replace Paul Carmichael with:
Paul Carmichael United Kingdom
Gregory Albo Canada
Mark Wickham‐Jones United Kingdom
Amanda Tattersall Australia
Sam Gindin Canada
Jane F. McAlevey United States
Glenn Adler South Africa
Jim Buller United Kingdom
Karl E. Klare United States
Stephen Crowley relative to Paul Carmichael United Kingdom Paul Carmichael's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Paul Carmichael · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Crowley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Crowley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Crowley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Crowley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Crowley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Crowley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Crowley. The network helps show where Stephen Crowley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Crowley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Crowley Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Crowley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004109
2 200385
3 199742
4 201536
5 199835
6 199426
7 200318
8 200417
9 199510
10
Comprehending the Weakness of Russia's Unions
20029
11 20177
12 20156
13 20205
14
From coal to steel: The formation of an independent workers' movement in the Soviet Union, 1989-1991.
19932
15 20212
16 19972
17 20111
18 20211
19 20221
20 20221

About Stephen Crowley

Stephen Crowley is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration, Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 23 papers that have together received 416 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Russia and Soviet political economy (8 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (3 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (2 papers), Post-Communist Economic and Political Transition (2 papers), Marine and fisheries research (1 paper), Employment and Welfare Studies (1 paper) and Avian ecology and behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (166 citations), Political Science and International Relations (321 citations), Urban Studies (22 citations), Sociology and Political Science (154 citations) and General Health Professions (69 citations). Stephen Crowley has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Slovenia. Frequent co-authors include David Ost, Elena A. Iankova, Michael Haynes and Miroslav Stanojević. Their work appears in journals such as Perspectives on Politics, Slavic Review, East European Politics and Societies and Cultures, Post-Soviet Affairs and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact