Stephen Colosimo

425 total citations
8 papers, 352 citations indexed

About

Stephen Colosimo is a scholar working on Physiology, Molecular Biology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Colosimo has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 352 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Physiology, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. Recurrent topics in Stephen Colosimo's work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (2 papers) and Sulfur Compounds in Biology (2 papers). Stephen Colosimo is often cited by papers focused on Smoking Behavior and Cessation (3 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (2 papers) and Sulfur Compounds in Biology (2 papers). Stephen Colosimo collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Stephen Colosimo's co-authors include John P. Richie, Joshua Muscat, Wayne Kleinman, Nancy J. Haley, Daniel W. Sepkovic, C. M. Axelrad, Steven D. Stellman, Mirjana V. Djordjevic, Philip Lazarus and Randall Harris and has published in prestigious journals such as Cancer, American Journal of Public Health and Free Radical Biology and Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Colosimo

8 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stephen Colosimo United States	7	134	105	85	58	49	8	352
Roberto Puntoni Italy	9	199 1.5×	99 0.9×	52 0.6×	22 0.4×	6 0.1×	9	377
Wenhui Gao China	10	164 1.2×	172 1.6×	29 0.3×	150 2.6×	32 0.7×	24	420
Srinivas Papaiahgari United States	8	85 0.6×	361 3.4×	32 0.4×	26 0.4×	49 1.0×	9	641
C H Shackleton United States	11	63 0.5×	164 1.6×	33 0.4×	25 0.4×	38 0.8×	12	541
Bo-Qing Zhu United States	7	70 0.5×	109 1.0×	32 0.4×	37 0.6×	23 0.5×	8	339
JH Graziano United States	12	75 0.6×	69 0.7×	116 1.4×	22 0.4×	50 1.0×	17	559
Stefania Stefanini Italy	14	54 0.4×	196 1.9×	95 1.1×	21 0.4×	42 0.9×	31	396
Maria Francesca Aleo Italy	13	82 0.6×	190 1.8×	115 1.4×	11 0.2×	53 1.1×	16	467
Emiko Muto Japan	10	175 1.3×	88 0.8×	33 0.4×	28 0.5×	20 0.4×	11	476
Alfred M. Nyanda United States	9	29 0.2×	173 1.6×	238 2.8×	27 0.5×	39 0.8×	11	538

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Colosimo

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Colosimo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Colosimo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Colosimo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Colosimo

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Colosimo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Colosimo. The network helps show where Stephen Colosimo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Colosimo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Colosimo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Colosimo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Colosimo. Stephen Colosimo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Muscat, Joshua, Mirjana V. Djordjevic, Stephen Colosimo, Steven D. Stellman, & John P. Richie. (2005). Racial differences in exposure and glucuronidation of the tobacco‐specific carcinogen 4‐(methylnitrosamino)‐1‐(3‐pyridyl)‐1‐butanone (NNK). Cancer. 103(7). 1420–1426. 57 indexed citations

2.

Muscat, Joshua, Wayne Kleinman, Stephen Colosimo, et al.. (2003). Enhanced protein glutathiolation and oxidative stress in cigarette smokers. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 36(4). 464–470. 69 indexed citations

3.

Kleinman, Wayne, Despina Komninou, Yvonne Leutzinger, et al.. (2003). Protein glutathiolation in human blood. Biochemical Pharmacology. 65(5). 741–746. 40 indexed citations

4.

Prokopczyk, Bogdan, Dietrich Hoffmann, A. J. Cunningham, et al.. (2002). Identification of Tobacco-Derived Compounds in Human Pancreatic Juice. Chemical Research in Toxicology. 15(5). 677–685. 77 indexed citations

5.

Weaver, Virginia M., et al.. (1996). Environmental tobacco smoke exposure in inner-city children.. PubMed. 5(2). 135–7. 42 indexed citations

6.

Haley, Nancy J., Stephen Colosimo, C. M. Axelrad, Randall Harris, & Daniel W. Sepkovic. (1989). Biochemical validation of self-reported exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Environmental Research. 49(1). 127–135. 50 indexed citations

7.

Sepkovic, Daniel W., et al.. (1988). Thyroid Hormone Levels and Cigarette Smoking in Baboons. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 187(2). 223–228. 5 indexed citations

8.

Sepkovic, Daniel W., Stephen Colosimo, C. M. Axelrad, John Adams, & Nancy J. Haley. (1986). The delivery and uptake of nicotine from an aerosol rod.. American Journal of Public Health. 76(11). 1343–1344. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact