Stephen Budiansky
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
- Ecology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Topics
- Science, Research, and Medicine (13 papers)Biotechnology and Related Fields (9 papers)Health and Medical Research Impacts (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Stephen Budiansky
115 papers receiving 288 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 155
- Molecular Biology 58
- Plant Science 35
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 32
- Ecology 30
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 25
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Budiansky
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Budiansky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Budiansky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Budiansky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Budiansky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Budiansky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Budiansky. The network helps show where Stephen Budiansky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Budiansky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Budiansky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Budiansky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Budiansky. Stephen Budiansky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blackett's War: The Men Who Defeated the Nazi U-Boats and Brought Science to the Art of Warfare | 1 |
| 2 | Air power : the men, machines, and ideas that revolutionized war, from Kitty Hawk to Iraq | 5 |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | THE PHYSICS OF GRIDLOCK. | 2 |
| 5 | If a Lion Could Talk | 2 |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | The cold war experiments. | 4 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | Understanding acid rain | 1 |
| 19 | New attention for atmospheric carbon | 3 |
| 20 | Bioenergy: the lesson of wood burning | 4 |
About Stephen Budiansky
Stephen Budiansky is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 136 papers that have together received 353 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Science, Research, and Medicine (13 papers), Biotechnology and Related Fields (9 papers) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Chemical Health and Safety (3 citations), Ecological Modeling (12 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (32 citations). Stephen Budiansky has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Tim Beardsley, Martin Saunders, Lawrence Freedman, Roy E. Schreiber and Deborah Shapley. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Science and Environmental Science & Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.