Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
THE CHEMOTACTIC EFFECT OF MIXTURES OF ANTIBODY AND ANTIGEN ON POLYMORPHONUCLEAR LEUCOCYTES
19622.3k citationsStephen BoydenThe Journal of Experimental Medicineprofile →
THE ADSORPTION OF PROTEINS ON ERYTHROCYTES TREATED WITH TANNIC ACID AND SUBSEQUENT HEMAGGLUTINATION BY ANTIPROTEIN SERA
19511.1k citationsStephen BoydenThe Journal of Experimental Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Boyden
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Boyden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Boyden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Boyden more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Boyden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Boyden. The network helps show where Stephen Boyden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Boyden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Boyden.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Boyden based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Boyden. Stephen Boyden is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Boyden, Stephen. (2004). The biology of civilisation : understanding human culture as a force in nature. Medical Entomology and Zoology.24 indexed citations
Boyden, Stephen, et al.. (1981). The Ecology of a city and its people : the case of Hong Kong. ANU Open Research (Australian National University).124 indexed citations
5.
Boyden, Stephen. (1980). Ecological study of human settlements.. 16(3). 2–9.1 indexed citations
6.
Boyden, Stephen. (1970). The Impact of civilisation on the biology of man.26 indexed citations
7.
Boyden, Stephen. (1969). The Human Organism in a Changing Environment. 28(3). 372.1 indexed citations
Boyden, Stephen & E. Sorkin. (1962). Effect of neonatal injections of protein on the immune response to protein-hapten complexes.. PubMed Central. 5. 370–7.27 indexed citations
13.
Boyden, Stephen. (1962). THE CHEMOTACTIC EFFECT OF MIXTURES OF ANTIBODY AND ANTIGEN ON POLYMORPHONUCLEAR LEUCOCYTES. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 115(3). 453–466.2254 indexed citations breakdown →
Boyden, Stephen & E. Sorkin. (1961). in vitro : The Adsorption of Antibody and Antigen by Spleen Cells Some Further Experiments. Immunology. 4(3). 244.39 indexed citations
Boyden, Stephen, et al.. (1955). Agglutination of normal erythrocytes in mixtures of antibody and antigen, haemolysis in the presence of complement.. PubMed. 36(2). 162–70.12 indexed citations
Boyden, Stephen. (1951). THE ADSORPTION OF PROTEINS ON ERYTHROCYTES TREATED WITH TANNIC ACID AND SUBSEQUENT HEMAGGLUTINATION BY ANTIPROTEIN SERA. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 93(2). 107–120.1117 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.