Stephen A. Kruth
Impact in
- Small Animals top 1%
- Equine top 5%
Papers in
- Equine 2
- Co-authors
- J. Scott WeeseAnthony C. G. Abrams‐OggCate DeweySarah E. BostonMarion L. JacksonIan D. DubéGalina M. HayesGordon S. Doig
- Journals
- Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine (13 papers)American Journal of Veterinary Research (6 papers)Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (6 papers)Blood (3 papers)Human Gene Therapy (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Stephen A. Kruth
69 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- Small Animals 297
- Equine 46
- Infectious Diseases 430
- Hematology 244
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 111
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen A. Kruth
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen A. Kruth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen A. Kruth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen A. Kruth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen A. Kruth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen A. Kruth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen A. Kruth. The network helps show where Stephen A. Kruth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen A. Kruth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 193 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 55 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 51 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 38 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 30 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 21 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 79 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 177 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 76 | |
| 17 | 1994 | 51 | |
| 18 | Small animal medicine | 1991 | 8 |
| 19 | 1990 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1989 | 41 |
About Stephen A. Kruth
Stephen A. Kruth is a scholar working on Small Animals, Equine, Hematology, Genetics and Genetics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virus-based gene therapy research (19 papers), Veterinary Oncology Research (10 papers), Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research (6 papers), Animal Genetics and Reproduction (6 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (5 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (4 papers), Blood groups and transfusion (4 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (297 citations), Equine (46 citations), Infectious Diseases (430 citations), Hematology (244 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (111 citations). Stephen A. Kruth has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include J. Scott Weese, Anthony C. G. Abrams‐Ogg, Cate Dewey, Sarah E. Boston, Marion L. Jackson, Ian D. Dubé, Galina M. Hayes, Gordon S. Doig, Ky L. Mathews and Luis G. Arroyo. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine, American Journal of Veterinary Research, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Blood and Human Gene Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.