Stephanie Rees
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 1%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Papers in
-
- Stress Responses and Cortisol 11
-
- Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior 10
- Co-authors
- Alison S. Fleming (9 shared papers)Meir Steiner (5 shared papers)Andrea González (1 shared paper)Vedran Lovic (1 shared paper)Ángel I. Melo (1 shared paper)Gary W. Kraemer (1 shared paper)Cynthia de Medeiros (2 shared papers)Catherine Bielajew (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Brain Research (3 papers)Hormones and Behavior (3 papers)Behavioural Brain Research (1 paper)Developmental Psychobiology (1 paper)Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephanie Rees
14 papers receiving 590 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Behavioral Neuroscience 324
- Social Psychology 431
- Biological Psychiatry 48
- Developmental Neuroscience 27
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 43
Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Rees
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Rees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Rees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Rees more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Rees
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Rees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Rees. The network helps show where Stephanie Rees may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephanie Rees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2002 | 146 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 87 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 81 | |
| 4 | 2004 | 80 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 58 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 32 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2001 | 22 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 20 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 16 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 3 | |
| 14 | Appropriate interpretation of longitudinal spirometry assessments | 2013 | 1 |
| 15 | 2021 | 0 |
About Stephanie Rees
Stephanie Rees is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Biological Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (11 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (10 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (3 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Cardiovascular and Diving-Related Complications (1 paper), Geological and Geophysical Studies (1 paper) and Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (324 citations), Social Psychology (431 citations), Biological Psychiatry (48 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (27 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (43 citations). Stephanie Rees has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Alison S. Fleming, Meir Steiner, Andrea González, Vedran Lovic, Ángel I. Melo, Gary W. Kraemer, Cynthia de Medeiros, Catherine Bielajew, Stephanie Baker and Roger Godbout. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Hormones and Behavior, Behavioural Brain Research, Developmental Psychobiology and Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.