Stephanie Poe

37 total papers · 709 total citations
23 papers, 549 citations indexed

About

Stephanie Poe is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Geriatrics and Gerontology and Health Information Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephanie Poe has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 549 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in General Health Professions, 5 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology and 4 papers in Health Information Management. Recurrent topics in Stephanie Poe's work include Health Sciences Research and Education (9 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers). Stephanie Poe is often cited by papers focused on Health Sciences Research and Education (9 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (4 papers) and Patient Safety and Medication Errors (4 papers). Stephanie Poe collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Stephanie Poe's co-authors include Robin Newhouse, Kathleen M. White, Maria Cvach, Linda C. Pugh, Sandra L. Dearholt, Patricia B. Dawson, Elizabeth Hill, Batya R. Radzik, Linda Costa and Laura Rocco and has published in prestigious journals such as JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration, Journal of Hospital Medicine and Journal of Nursing Care Quality.

In The Last Decade

Stephanie Poe

21 papers receiving 498 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Stephanie Poe	227	143	119	109	93	23	549
Nicholas Waldron	169 0.7×	307 2.1×	37 0.3×	110 1.0×	82 0.9×	27	602
Louise Shaw	116 0.5×	112 0.8×	32 0.3×	95 0.9×	31 0.3×	36	508
Clayton J. Shuman	224 1.0×	51 0.4×	80 0.7×	171 1.6×	14 0.2×	45	527
Helga E. Breimaier	307 1.4×	46 0.3×	91 0.8×	87 0.8×	27 0.3×	10	455
Jacqueline Francis‐Coad	165 0.7×	214 1.5×	28 0.2×	68 0.6×	82 0.9×	40	454
Angela Benoit	140 0.6×	196 1.4×	68 0.6×	77 0.7×	48 0.5×	13	483
Thomas Kippenbrock	189 0.8×	151 1.1×	37 0.3×	70 0.6×	46 0.5×	27	456
Dhurata Ivziku	170 0.7×	122 0.9×	46 0.4×	70 0.6×	55 0.6×	50	547
Susan Klaus	215 0.9×	48 0.3×	53 0.4×	44 0.4×	23 0.2×	15	466
James B. Connelly	123 0.5×	247 1.7×	19 0.2×	93 0.9×	85 0.9×	10	609

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Poe

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Poe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Poe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Poe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Poe

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Poe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Poe. The network helps show where Stephanie Poe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Poe

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Poe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Poe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Poe. Stephanie Poe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact