Stephanie Parker

1.1k total citations
32 papers, 596 citations indexed

About

Stephanie Parker is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Rehabilitation and Internal Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephanie Parker has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 596 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Epidemiology, 14 papers in Rehabilitation and 13 papers in Internal Medicine. Recurrent topics in Stephanie Parker's work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (26 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (14 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (13 papers). Stephanie Parker is often cited by papers focused on Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (26 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (14 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (13 papers). Stephanie Parker collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Stephanie Parker's co-authors include James C. Grotta, Ritvij Bowry, Suja S. Rajan, David Persse, Kamilah Jackson, José‐Miguel Yamal, Elizabeth A. Noser, Tzu‐Ching Wu, Tzu-Ching Wu and Laura Richardson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Stephanie Parker

29 papers receiving 580 citations

Peers

Stephanie Parker
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Epidemiology 472
  • Rehabilitation 233
  • Internal Medicine 217
  • Neurology 204
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 72
Replace Miquel Gallofré with:
Miquel Gallofré Spain
Jeffery Frank United States
Ethan S. Brandler United States
Mark J. Lowell United States
Lars-Åke Marké Sweden
Carla Heloísa Cabral Moro Brazil
Ellen Debenham United States
Sebastián Fridman Canada
Imama Naqvi United States
Erwan d’Aranda France
Miquel Gallofré Spain View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Stephanie Parker
Stephanie Parker · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Stephanie Parker
Stephanie Parker · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Parker. The network helps show where Stephanie Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Parker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Parker. Stephanie Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 9
3 1
4 5
5 2
6 2
7 4
8 2
9 0
10 14
11 34
12 2
13 9
14 79
15 22
16 25
17 1
18 10
19
The Mathematical Magic of Perfect Numbers
0
20
The Oxford Spanish dictionary : Spanish-English/English-Spanish = El diccionario Oxford : Español-Inglés/Inglés-Español
2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026