Stephanie H. Laseter
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Water Science and Technology top 5%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Co-authors
- James M. VoseChelcy R. FordWayne T. SwankChelcy Ford MiniatKatherine J. ElliottLloyd W. SwiftSteven T. BrantleyNeil Pederson
- Topics
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers)Tree-ring climate responses (4 papers)Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Stephanie H. Laseter
9 papers receiving 499 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Global and Planetary Change 379
- Water Science and Technology 210
- Atmospheric Science 180
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 143
- Ecology 137
Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie H. Laseter
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie H. Laseter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie H. Laseter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie H. Laseter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie H. Laseter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie H. Laseter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie H. Laseter. The network helps show where Stephanie H. Laseter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie H. Laseter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie H. Laseter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie H. Laseter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie H. Laseter. Stephanie H. Laseter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental forests of the Southern Research Station: highlights of foundational silviculture studies | 2 |
| 2 | 26 | |
| 3 | 107 | |
| 4 | 97 | |
| 5 | Variations in canopy and litter interception across a forest chronosequence in the southern Appalachian Mountains | 1 |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 105 | |
| 8 | 134 | |
| 9 | Stream nitrogen responses to fire in the Southeastern U.S. | 5 |
About Stephanie H. Laseter
Stephanie H. Laseter is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (6 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (4 papers) and Fire effects on ecosystems (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (379 citations), Water Science and Technology (210 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (143 citations). Stephanie H. Laseter has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James M. Vose, Chelcy R. Ford, Wayne T. Swank, Chelcy Ford Miniat, Katherine J. Elliott, Lloyd W. Swift, Steven T. Brantley, Neil Pederson, Peter V. Caldwell and Tim Burt. Their work appears in journals such as Global Change Biology, Ecological Applications and International Journal of Climatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.