Stephan de Groot

753 total citations · 1 hit paper
5 papers, 378 citations indexed

About

Stephan de Groot is a scholar working on Surgery, Agronomy and Crop Science and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephan de Groot has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 378 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Surgery, 2 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 2 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Stephan de Groot's work include Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (2 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (2 papers) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (2 papers). Stephan de Groot is often cited by papers focused on Crop Yield and Soil Fertility (2 papers), Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (2 papers) and Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (2 papers). Stephan de Groot collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Netherlands and Kazakhstan. Stephan de Groot's co-authors include Satyvaldy Jatayev, Francois Koekemoer, Yuri Shavrukov, Akhylbek Kurishbayev, Peter Langridge, Kathleen L. Soole, Vladimir Shvidchenko, Lyudmila Zotova, H.J. Lindeboom and Tim A. E. J. Boymans and has published in prestigious journals such as Frontiers in Plant Science, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders and Musculoskeletal Care.

In The Last Decade

Stephan de Groot

5 papers receiving 366 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Early Flowering as a Drought Escape Mechanism in Plants: How Can It Aid Wheat Production?

2017 338 citations Yuri Shavrukov, Akhylbek Kurishbayev et al. Frontiers in Plant Science profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stephan de Groot Australia	4	299	93	48	45	38	5	378
Matthew D. Thom United States	9	170 0.6×	72 0.8×	58 1.2×	18 0.4×	90 2.4×	10	302
Marie Bouteillé France	3	414 1.4×	55 0.6×	108 2.3×	94 2.1×	27 0.7×	3	464
Vladimir Shvidchenko Kazakhstan	4	351 1.2×	106 1.1×	67 1.4×	24 0.5×	40 1.1×	9	395
Francois Koekemoer Australia	2	314 1.1×	102 1.1×	48 1.0×	23 0.5×	38 1.0×	4	355
Lyudmila Zotova Kazakhstan	6	369 1.2×	110 1.2×	81 1.7×	23 0.5×	41 1.1×	13	431
Dagmara Gasior United Kingdom	10	277 0.9×	74 0.8×	66 1.4×	51 1.1×	86 2.3×	18	342
Kou Nakazono Japan	6	414 1.4×	97 1.0×	82 1.7×	34 0.8×	46 1.2×	17	489
Aparna Kakkera India	4	381 1.3×	92 1.0×	39 0.8×	167 3.7×	41 1.1×	5	445
Jean‐Paul Sampoux France	10	253 0.8×	127 1.4×	25 0.5×	34 0.8×	82 2.2×	17	381
Arild Larsen Norway	12	294 1.0×	90 1.0×	26 0.5×	45 1.0×	78 2.1×	22	386

Countries citing papers authored by Stephan de Groot

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephan de Groot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephan de Groot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephan de Groot more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephan de Groot

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephan de Groot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephan de Groot. The network helps show where Stephan de Groot may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephan de Groot

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephan de Groot. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephan de Groot based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephan de Groot. Stephan de Groot is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Trethowan, Richard, et al.. (2024). Identifying the seeds of heterotic pools for Southern and Eastern Africa from global elite spring wheat germplasm. Frontiers in Plant Science. 15. 1398715–1398715. 1 indexed citations

2.

Groot, Stephan de, Wim P. Krijnen, Carolien M. Kooijman, et al.. (2023). Protocol for a multicenter study on effectiveness and economics of the Back At work After Surgery (BAAS): a clinical pathway for knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 24(1). 199–199. 4 indexed citations

3.

Boymans, Tim A. E. J., et al.. (2022). Implementation of back at work after surgery (BAAS): A feasibility study of an integrated pathway for improved return to work after knee arthroplasty. Musculoskeletal Care. 20(4). 950–959. 10 indexed citations

4.

Shavrukov, Yuri, Akhylbek Kurishbayev, Satyvaldy Jatayev, et al.. (2017). Early Flowering as a Drought Escape Mechanism in Plants: How Can It Aid Wheat Production?. Frontiers in Plant Science. 8. 1950–1950. 338 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Lindeboom, H.J. & Stephan de Groot. (1998). The effects of different types of fisheries on the north sea and Irish sea benthic ecosystems. IMACT -II. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact