Sten Gillner

13 papers receiving 841 citations

Peers

Sten Gillner
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 485
  • Environmental Engineering 413
  • Global and Planetary Change 466
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 165
  • Speech and Hearing 72
Replace S.E. Maco with:
S.E. Maco United States
Paul W. Stringer Canada
Xingyang Yu China
Jerry Bond United States
Teresa Mexia Portugal
Yanting Hu China
Juan Caldentey Chile
Valda Araminienė Lithuania
Gabriele Guidolotti Italy
Carmen Van Mechelen Belgium
Sten Gillner relative to S.E. Maco United States S.E. Maco's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
S.E. Maco · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sten Gillner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sten Gillner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sten Gillner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sten Gillner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sten Gillner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sten Gillner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sten Gillner. The network helps show where Sten Gillner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Sten Gillner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sten Gillner Line = papers co-authored together Sten Gillner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2015254
2 2009165
3 2016115
4 201490
5 201354
6 201651
7 201346
8 202039
9 201523
10 201720
11 201810
12
Stadtbäume im Klimawandel - Dendrochronologische und physiologische Untersuchungen zur Identifikation der Trockenstressempfindlichkeit häufig verwendeter Stadtbaumarten in Dresden.
20125
13 20204

About Sten Gillner

Sten Gillner is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering and Plant Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 876 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban Green Space and Health (7 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (5 papers), Tree-ring climate responses (5 papers), Urban Heat Island Mitigation (5 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (4 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (3 papers), Plant Ecology and Soil Science (2 papers) and Forest ecology and management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (485 citations), Environmental Engineering (413 citations), Global and Planetary Change (466 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (165 citations) and Speech and Hearing (72 citations). Sten Gillner has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Roloff, Juliane Vogt, Sandra Korn, Achim Bräuning, M Hofmann, Uta Berger, Tina Gerstenberg, Nadja Rüger, Ágnes Gulyás and Robert R. Junker. Their work appears in journals such as Urban forestry & urban greening, Landscape and Urban Planning, Forests, Urban Ecosystems and Trees.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact