Stella Black

34 papers receiving 434 citations

Peers

Stella Black
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 25
  • Health 104
  • Clinical Psychology 169
  • General Health Professions 184
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 34
Replace Tess Moeke‐Maxwell with:
Tess Moeke‐Maxwell New Zealand
Berit Sæteren Norway
Manoj Rajagopal United Kingdom
Martha Porter United States
Jacquelyn Benson United States
Hilary Tetlow United Kingdom
Andrew Harding United Kingdom
Cheryl Delgado United States
Danuta Zarzycka Poland
Åsa Roxberg Sweden
Stella Black relative to Tess Moeke‐Maxwell New Zealand Tess Moeke‐Maxwell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Tess Moeke‐Maxwell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stella Black

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stella Black's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stella Black with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stella Black more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stella Black

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stella Black. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stella Black. The network helps show where Stella Black may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stella Black, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stella Black Line = papers co-authored together Stella Black links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201957
2 201333
3 201729
4 200728
5 201924
6 201923
7 201820
8 195220
9 201819
10 201918
11 201717
12 201616
13 202014
14 201512
15 201912
16 202212
17 201612
18 201312
19
Differences in New Zealand Secondary School Students' Reported Strengths and Difficulties
201011
20 201811

About Stella Black

Stella Black is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (14 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (13 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (5 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (5 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (25 citations), Health (104 citations), Clinical Psychology (169 citations), General Health Professions (184 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (34 citations). Stella Black has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Merryn Gott, Tess Moeke‐Maxwell, Lisa Williams, Janine Wiles, Tessa Morgan, Ofa Dewes, Hong‐Jae Park, Amanda Wheeler, M. Mooney and Grant Christie. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Palliative Medicine, BMC Palliative Care, Aging & Mental Health and International Journal of Palliative Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact