Steffen J. Glaser

15.8k total citations · 5 hit papers
263 papers, 11.3k citations indexed

About

Steffen J. Glaser is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Biophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, Steffen J. Glaser has authored 263 papers receiving a total of 11.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 166 papers in Spectroscopy, 101 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 78 papers in Biophysics. Recurrent topics in Steffen J. Glaser's work include Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (152 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (76 papers) and NMR spectroscopy and applications (72 papers). Steffen J. Glaser is often cited by papers focused on Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (152 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (76 papers) and NMR spectroscopy and applications (72 papers). Steffen J. Glaser collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and France. Steffen J. Glaser's co-authors include Navin Khaneja, Burkhard Luy, Thomas Schulte‐Herbrüggen, Timo O. Reiss, Cindie Kehlet, Thomas E. Skinner, Roger W. Brockett, Christian Griesinger, O. Schedletzky and D. Sugny and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

In The Last Decade

Steffen J. Glaser

257 papers receiving 11.0k citations

Hit Papers

Optimal control of couple... 1994 2026 2004 2015 2004 1994 2001 2015 2018 400 800 1.2k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Steffen J. Glaser Germany 51 5.4k 4.5k 3.9k 1.9k 1.8k 263 11.3k
Dieter Suter Germany 46 5.2k 1.0× 1.9k 0.4× 2.4k 0.6× 870 0.5× 2.3k 1.3× 250 8.7k
Navin Khaneja United States 39 3.2k 0.6× 2.1k 0.5× 2.6k 0.7× 1.1k 0.6× 716 0.4× 111 5.9k
David T. Pegg Australia 39 4.1k 0.8× 1.9k 0.4× 2.9k 0.8× 1.1k 0.6× 394 0.2× 178 7.1k
Alfred G. Redfield United States 46 3.1k 0.6× 5.3k 1.2× 592 0.2× 2.8k 1.5× 2.6k 1.5× 130 11.0k
Burkhard Luy Germany 47 1.5k 0.3× 3.8k 0.8× 622 0.2× 1.3k 0.7× 599 0.3× 203 6.8k
William D. Phillips United States 70 13.2k 2.5× 2.7k 0.6× 2.5k 0.6× 450 0.2× 1.2k 0.7× 250 18.0k
Malcolm H. Levitt United Kingdom 73 4.6k 0.9× 15.1k 3.3× 534 0.1× 7.7k 4.0× 8.8k 5.0× 298 20.1k
Jonathan A. Jones United Kingdom 38 2.8k 0.5× 942 0.2× 2.4k 0.6× 370 0.2× 1.1k 0.6× 106 6.2k
Norman F. Ramsey United States 51 5.8k 1.1× 3.3k 0.7× 760 0.2× 2.3k 1.2× 777 0.4× 272 10.1k
Attila Szabó United States 74 9.9k 1.8× 5.2k 1.2× 376 0.1× 1.5k 0.8× 5.5k 3.1× 209 27.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Steffen J. Glaser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steffen J. Glaser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steffen J. Glaser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steffen J. Glaser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steffen J. Glaser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steffen J. Glaser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steffen J. Glaser. The network helps show where Steffen J. Glaser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Steffen J. Glaser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Steffen J. Glaser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Steffen J. Glaser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Steffen J. Glaser. Steffen J. Glaser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Glaser, Steffen J., et al.. (2024). Wigner state and process tomography on near-term quantum devices. Quantum Information Processing. 23(10). 1 indexed citations
2.
Glaser, Steffen J., et al.. (2024). A Digital and Interactive Tool to Learn 1H NMR Spectroscopy: The SpinDrops Learning Environment. Journal of Chemical Education. 101(8). 3202–3215. 1 indexed citations
3.
Koczor, Bálint, et al.. (2023). Phase Spaces, Parity Operators, and the Born–Jordan Distribution. Annales Henri Poincaré. 24(12). 4169–4236. 2 indexed citations
4.
Koch, Christiane P., Ugo Boscain, Tommaso Calarco, et al.. (2022). Quantum optimal control in quantum technologies. Strategic report on current status, visions and goals for research in Europe. EPJ Quantum Technology. 9(1). 2 indexed citations
5.
Beluffi, C., et al.. (2021). Application of Optimal Control Theory to Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance. Molecules. 26(10). 2860–2860. 1 indexed citations
6.
Assländer, Jakob, et al.. (2021). Generalized Bloch model: A theory for pulsed magnetization transfer. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 87(4). 2003–2017. 14 indexed citations
7.
Koczor, Bálint, Robert Zeier, & Steffen J. Glaser. (2020). Continuous phase-space representations for finite-dimensional quantum states and their tomography. Physical review. A. 101(2). 22 indexed citations
8.
Guéry-Odelin, David, et al.. (2020). Robust control of an ensemble of springs: Application to ion cyclotron resonance and two-level quantum systems. Physical review. A. 102(5). 14 indexed citations
9.
Glaser, Steffen J., et al.. (2020). Purity speed limit of open quantum systems from magic subspaces. Physical review. A. 102(3). 5 indexed citations
10.
Glaser, Steffen J., et al.. (2020). Robust control of a not gate by composite pulses. Physical review. A. 101(1). 21 indexed citations
11.
Koczor, Bálint, Robert Zeier, & Steffen J. Glaser. (2020). Fast computation of spherical phase-space functions of quantum many-body states. Physical review. A. 102(6). 10 indexed citations
12.
Reeth, Éric Van, H. Ratiney, M. Lapert, Steffen J. Glaser, & D. Sugny. (2017). Optimal control theory for applications in Magnetic Resonance Imaging. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 6 indexed citations
13.
Assémat, Elie, et al.. (2013). On the application of geometric optimal control theory to Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. Mathematical Control and Related Fields. 3(4). 375–396. 7 indexed citations
14.
Neves, Jorge Luiz, et al.. (2008). Quantum Pattern Recognition With Liquid State NMR. arXiv (Cornell University). 3 indexed citations
15.
Weitnauer, Gabriele, et al.. (2004). Novel Avilamycin Derivatives with Improved Polarity Generated by Targeted Gene Disruption. Chemistry & Biology. 11(10). 1403–1411. 31 indexed citations
16.
Skinner, Thomas E., Timo O. Reiss, Burkhard Luy, Navin Khaneja, & Steffen J. Glaser. (2003). Application of optimal control theory to the design of broadband excitation pulses for high-resolution NMR. Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 163(1). 8–15. 226 indexed citations
17.
Glaser, Steffen J.. (2001). NMR-Quantencomputer. Angewandte Chemie. 113(1). 151–153. 3 indexed citations
18.
Glaser, Steffen J.. (2001). NMR Quantum Computing. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 40(1). 147–149. 12 indexed citations
19.
Lorenz, Michael G., et al.. (1998). Structural studies of histidine‐containing phosphocarrier protein from Enterococcus faecalis. European Journal of Biochemistry. 252(1). 51–58. 8 indexed citations
20.
Glaser, Steffen J., et al.. (1989). Complete assignment of the deoxyribose 5'/5" proton resonances of the EcoRI DNA sequence using isotropic mixing. Biochemistry. 28(4). 1483–1487. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026