Stefanie Kreft
- Materials Chemistry
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment top 10%
- Catalysis top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Matthias BellerHenrik JungeSebastian WohlrabDuo WeiEvgenii V. KondratenkoDominik SeeburgJabor RabeahRoland Schoch
- Topics
- Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (9 papers)Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (5 papers)Catalysts for Methane Reforming (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Power SourcesApplied Catalysis B: EnvironmentalThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomDenmark
In The Last Decade
Stefanie Kreft
16 papers receiving 388 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Materials Chemistry 281
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 204
- Catalysis 106
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 57
- Biomedical Engineering 45
Countries citing papers authored by Stefanie Kreft
This map shows the geographic impact of Stefanie Kreft's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stefanie Kreft with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stefanie Kreft more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stefanie Kreft
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stefanie Kreft. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stefanie Kreft. The network helps show where Stefanie Kreft may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stefanie Kreft
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stefanie Kreft. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stefanie Kreft based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stefanie Kreft. Stefanie Kreft is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90 | |
| 2 | 95 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | 70 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 9 |
About Stefanie Kreft
Stefanie Kreft is a scholar working on Catalysis, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Materials Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 396 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (9 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (5 papers) and Catalysts for Methane Reforming (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Catalysis (106 citations), Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (204 citations) and Materials Chemistry (281 citations). Stefanie Kreft has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Matthias Beller, Henrik Junge, Sebastian Wohlrab, Duo Wei, Evgenii V. Kondratenko, Dominik Seeburg, Jabor Rabeah, Roland Schoch, Vita A. Kondratenko and Matthias Bauer. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Power Sources, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental and The Journal of Physical Chemistry C.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.