Stanley Rush

2.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
31 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Stanley Rush is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cognitive Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Stanley Rush has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 7 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Stanley Rush's work include ECG Monitoring and Analysis (9 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (8 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers). Stanley Rush is often cited by papers focused on ECG Monitoring and Analysis (9 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (8 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers). Stanley Rush collaborates with scholars based in United States. Stanley Rush's co-authors include Daniel A. Driscoll, Richard McFee, J.A. Abildskov, Lelon A. Weaver, E. Lepeschkin, Ian A. F. Stokes, Larry D. Haugh, Mary Moffroid, A. H. Turner and D. S. Montgomery and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Applied Physics, Circulation Research and Spine.

In The Last Decade

Stanley Rush

30 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Resistivity of Body Tissues at Low Frequencies 1963 2026 1984 2005 1963 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stanley Rush United States 16 607 591 434 364 323 31 2.0k
David Cohen United States 28 2.0k 3.2× 204 0.3× 395 0.9× 428 1.2× 247 0.8× 53 3.6k
Thomas Peschel Germany 32 749 1.2× 166 0.3× 299 0.7× 828 2.3× 283 0.9× 118 3.7k
Socrates Dokos Australia 27 857 1.4× 926 1.6× 851 2.0× 594 1.6× 978 3.0× 197 3.0k
M. Eiselt Germany 22 735 1.2× 417 0.7× 268 0.6× 118 0.3× 175 0.5× 77 1.6k
A. van Oosterom Netherlands 35 1.3k 2.1× 2.1k 3.5× 1.2k 2.7× 578 1.6× 485 1.5× 151 4.3k
Jean Delbeke Belgium 26 1.3k 2.1× 280 0.5× 653 1.5× 752 2.1× 1.8k 5.5× 116 2.9k
Giovanni Calcagnini Italy 26 269 0.4× 1.0k 1.7× 490 1.1× 196 0.5× 81 0.3× 151 2.0k
B. Neil Cuffin United States 28 1.8k 3.0× 115 0.2× 207 0.5× 338 0.9× 202 0.6× 40 2.6k
Jaakko Malmivuo Finland 20 1.0k 1.7× 693 1.2× 702 1.6× 555 1.5× 306 0.9× 107 2.6k
Thom F. Oostendorp Netherlands 22 1.2k 2.0× 625 1.1× 416 1.0× 292 0.8× 246 0.8× 91 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Stanley Rush

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stanley Rush's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stanley Rush with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stanley Rush more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stanley Rush

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stanley Rush. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stanley Rush. The network helps show where Stanley Rush may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stanley Rush

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stanley Rush. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stanley Rush based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stanley Rush. Stanley Rush is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stokes, Ian A. F., Mary Moffroid, Stanley Rush, & Larry D. Haugh. (1989). EMG to Torque Relationship in Rectus Abdominis Muscle. Spine. 14(8). 857–861. 10 indexed citations
2.
Rush, Stanley. (1988). Catspaw: A model of animal behavior and learning. Systems Research and Behavioral Science. 33(4). 257–271.
3.
Stokes, Ian A. F., et al.. (1988). Comparison of acoustic and electrical signals from erectores spinae muscles. Muscle & Nerve. 11(4). 331–336. 38 indexed citations
4.
Stokes, Ian A. F., et al.. (1987). Trunk Extensor EMG – Torque Relationship. Spine. 12(8). 770–776. 41 indexed citations
5.
Cohn, Robert L., Stanley Rush, & E. Lepeschkin. (1982). Theoretical Analyses and Computer Simulation of EGG Ventricular Gradient and Recovery Waveforms. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. BME-29(6). 413–423. 8 indexed citations
6.
Rush, Stanley, et al.. (1980). Quantitative comparison of pre-mortem ECG's with those reconstructed from activation data of a revived heart. Journal of Electrocardiology. 13(3). 275–282. 4 indexed citations
7.
Rush, Stanley. (1978). Relationships Among Green's Theorem, Helmholtz' Theorem, and Integral Equation Methods of Solving the Forward EGG Problem. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. BME-25(3). 283–287. 1 indexed citations
8.
Rush, Stanley, et al.. (1978). A Practical Algorithm for Solving Dynamic Membrane Equations. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. BME-25(4). 389–392. 323 indexed citations
9.
Weaver, Lelon A., et al.. (1977). Application of a Muscle-Potential Monitor to Electroconvulsive Therapy. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. BME-24(2). 197–199. 1 indexed citations
10.
Weaver, Lelon A., et al.. (1976). Current density in bilateral and unilateral ECT.. PubMed. 11(3). 303–12. 83 indexed citations
11.
Rush, Stanley. (1975). On the Independence of Magnetic and Electric Body Surface Recordings. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. BME-22(3). 157–167. 34 indexed citations
12.
Abildskov, J.A., Stanley Rush, Mary Jo Burgess, & Kay Millar. (1972). Graphic studies concerning the body surface distribution of T potentials. American Heart Journal. 83(2). 283–285. 5 indexed citations
13.
Rush, Stanley, et al.. (1970). Stimulation of cardiac muscle by a time-varying magnetic field. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 6(2). 321–322. 35 indexed citations
14.
Rush, Stanley, et al.. (1969). EEG Electrode Sensitivity-An Application of Reciprocity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. BME-16(3). 204–204. 8 indexed citations
15.
Rush, Stanley & Daniel A. Driscoll. (1969). EEG Electrode Sensitivity-An Application of Reciprocity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. BME-16(1). 15–22. 351 indexed citations
16.
Rush, Stanley, et al.. (1968). Electrical and Thermal Properties of Double-Barreled Ultra Microelectrodes. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. BME-15(2). 80–93. 6 indexed citations
17.
McFee, Richard & Stanley Rush. (1968). Qualitative effects of thoracic resistivity variations on the interpretation of electrocardiograms: The low resistance surface layer. American Heart Journal. 76(1). 48–61. 48 indexed citations
18.
Rush, Stanley. (1967). A Principle for Solving a Class of Anisotropic Current Flow Problems and Applications to Electrocardiography. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. BME-14(1). 18–22. 17 indexed citations
19.
Rush, Stanley, J.A. Abildskov, & Richard McFee. (1963). Resistivity of Body Tissues at Low Frequencies. Circulation Research. 12(1). 40–50. 356 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Rush, Stanley. (1962). Methods of measuring the resistivities of anisotropic conducting media in situ. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards Section C Engineering and Instrumentation. 66C(3). 217–217. 53 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026