Stanley M. Lewis
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Samuel J. ShubrooksThomas HillRichard W. NestoEdward KosinskiDavid F. TorchianaPaul DreyerRichard E. KuntzDavid M. Shahian
- Topics
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (12 papers)Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (9 papers)Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIsrael
In The Last Decade
Stanley M. Lewis
28 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 722
- Surgery 438
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 374
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 186
- Epidemiology 126
Countries citing papers authored by Stanley M. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of Stanley M. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stanley M. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stanley M. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stanley M. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stanley M. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stanley M. Lewis. The network helps show where Stanley M. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stanley M. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stanley M. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stanley M. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stanley M. Lewis. Stanley M. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 214 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 73 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 52 | |
| 13 | 29 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 72 | |
| 17 | 30 | |
| 18 | 109 | |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 84 |
About Stanley M. Lewis
Stanley M. Lewis is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery, having authored 28 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (12 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (9 papers) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (722 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (374 citations) and Surgery (438 citations). Stanley M. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Samuel J. Shubrooks, Thomas Hill, Richard W. Nesto, Edward Kosinski, David F. Torchiana, Paul Dreyer, Richard E. Kuntz, David M. Shahian, Sharon‐Lise T. Normand and W. P. Cleland. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Diabetes Care.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.