Stacie Smith

666 total citations
10 papers, 275 citations indexed

About

Stacie Smith is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Surgery and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Stacie Smith has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 275 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health, 3 papers in Surgery and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Stacie Smith's work include Epilepsy research and treatment (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). Stacie Smith is often cited by papers focused on Epilepsy research and treatment (5 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). Stacie Smith collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Canada. Stacie Smith's co-authors include Simon Shorvon, Matthew C. Walker, Catherine Scott, R. Birch, N.P. Hirsch, Robin Howard, D. R. Fish, William Harkness, Martin Smith and H. Meierkord and has published in prestigious journals such as Critical Care Medicine, Movement Disorders and Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.

In The Last Decade

Stacie Smith

8 papers receiving 261 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stacie Smith United Kingdom 7 182 104 92 48 41 10 275
Wolfgang Mühlhofer United States 7 169 0.9× 90 0.9× 76 0.8× 88 1.8× 48 1.2× 11 296
Colin Kazina Canada 11 157 0.9× 88 0.8× 90 1.0× 19 0.4× 84 2.0× 23 261
James Valeriano United States 9 173 1.0× 91 0.9× 94 1.0× 16 0.3× 85 2.1× 16 285
Daniela Audenino Italy 8 154 0.8× 71 0.7× 75 0.8× 28 0.6× 60 1.5× 17 304
Kaarkuzhali Babu Krishnamurthy United States 8 260 1.4× 131 1.3× 159 1.7× 73 1.5× 27 0.7× 17 322
Tzu‐Chun Lin Taiwan 6 166 0.9× 107 1.0× 58 0.6× 75 1.6× 56 1.4× 8 317
Hsiang‐Yao Hsieh Taiwan 9 98 0.5× 68 0.7× 43 0.5× 51 1.1× 125 3.0× 18 289
Brian G. Wilhelmi United States 5 207 1.1× 104 1.0× 131 1.4× 57 1.2× 46 1.1× 9 291
C. Ori Italy 9 60 0.3× 54 0.5× 16 0.2× 38 0.8× 70 1.7× 25 281
Danièle Hasaerts Belgium 10 102 0.6× 104 1.0× 140 1.5× 48 1.0× 48 1.2× 13 323

Countries citing papers authored by Stacie Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacie Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacie Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacie Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacie Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacie Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacie Smith. The network helps show where Stacie Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacie Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacie Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacie Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacie Smith. Stacie Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Anderson, Diana C., et al.. (2025). Windows in the ICU and Postoperative Delirium: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Critical Care Medicine. 53(3). e590–e599.
2.
Moss, Stephana J., Rebecca Brundin‐Mather, Beth Halperin, et al.. (2024). Well-being approaches targeted to improve child and youth health post-COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. BMC Health Services Research. 24(1). 758–758. 1 indexed citations
3.
Smith, Stacie & A J Webb. (2024). Brachial Plexus Injury Following Fracture-Dislocation of the Proximal Humerus: A Case Report. Cureus. 16(10). e72593–e72593.
4.
Birch, R., et al.. (2003). Neurophysiological Prediction of Outcome in Obstetric Lesions of the Brachial Plexus. Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume). 28(2). 148–152. 34 indexed citations
5.
Keunen, R.W.M., Cornelis J. Stam, D.L.J. Tavy, et al.. (1998). Nonlinear analysis of EEG in septic encephalopathy. Neurological Research. 20(2). 100–106. 22 indexed citations
6.
Walker, Matthew C., et al.. (1996). Diagnosis and treatment of status epilepticus on a neurological intensive care unit. QJM. 89(12). 913–920. 65 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Martin, Stacie Smith, Catherine Scott, & William Harkness. (1996). Activation of the electrocorticogram by propofol during surgery for epilepsy. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 76(4). 499–502. 40 indexed citations
8.
Walker, Matthew C., Stacie Smith, & Simon Shorvon. (1995). The intensive care treatment of convulsive status epilepticus in the UK. Anaesthesia. 50(2). 130–135. 45 indexed citations
9.
Meierkord, H., D. R. Fish, Stacie Smith, et al.. (1992). Is nocturnal paroxysmal dystonia a form of frontal lobe epilepsy?. Movement Disorders. 7(1). 38–42. 59 indexed citations
10.
Allen, Philip J., Stacie Smith, & Catherine Scott. (1992). Measurement of interhemispheric time differences in generalised spike-and-wave. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 82(1). 81–84. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026