Stacey McCrary

867 total citations · 1 hit paper
12 papers, 542 citations indexed

About

Stacey McCrary is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Stacey McCrary has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 542 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Education and 2 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Stacey McCrary's work include Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (2 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). Stacey McCrary is often cited by papers focused on Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (2 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers). Stacey McCrary collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Singapore. Stacey McCrary's co-authors include Enola K. Proctor, Nancy Morrow‐Howell, Douglas A. Luke, Annaliese Calhoun, Curtis McMillen, Ross C. Brownson, Margaret Padek, Amanda Moore McBride, Melissa Jonson‐Reid and Cole Hooley and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Public Administration Review and Implementation Science.

In The Last Decade

Stacey McCrary

11 papers receiving 528 citations

Hit Papers

Sustainability of evidence-based healthcare: research age... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stacey McCrary United States 9 342 94 87 65 55 12 542
Christian Brand United Kingdom 14 293 0.9× 78 0.8× 41 0.5× 54 0.8× 26 0.5× 41 479
Jane Straker United States 14 515 1.5× 141 1.5× 100 1.1× 59 0.9× 122 2.2× 78 677
Anna Dunér Sweden 17 591 1.7× 120 1.3× 125 1.4× 119 1.8× 75 1.4× 37 846
Kayne D. Mettert United States 14 570 1.7× 45 0.5× 99 1.1× 103 1.6× 18 0.3× 27 770
Zachary Hass United States 9 219 0.6× 96 1.0× 96 1.1× 28 0.4× 62 1.1× 32 365
Jorid Kalseth Norway 16 317 0.9× 58 0.6× 107 1.2× 169 2.6× 35 0.6× 45 741
Sandra P. Hirst Canada 12 240 0.7× 119 1.3× 61 0.7× 22 0.3× 129 2.3× 61 698
Tor Inge Romøren Norway 14 367 1.1× 83 0.9× 75 0.9× 64 1.0× 54 1.0× 31 546
Cyleste Collins United States 14 247 0.7× 57 0.6× 65 0.7× 27 0.4× 36 0.7× 46 452

Countries citing papers authored by Stacey McCrary

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey McCrary's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey McCrary with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey McCrary more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey McCrary

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey McCrary. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey McCrary. The network helps show where Stacey McCrary may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacey McCrary

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacey McCrary. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacey McCrary based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacey McCrary. Stacey McCrary is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Combs, Todd, Stacey McCrary, Rinad S. Beidas, et al.. (2024). The Translational Science Benefits Model, a new training tool for demonstrating implementation science impact: A pilot study. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science. 8(1). e142–e142. 3 indexed citations
2.
Hudson, Darrell, et al.. (2021). Documenting Behavioral Health Needs in an Urban Setting. Frontiers in Public Health. 9. 493884–493884. 1 indexed citations
4.
5.
Proctor, Enola K., Douglas A. Luke, Annaliese Calhoun, et al.. (2015). Sustainability of evidence-based healthcare: research agenda, methodological advances, and infrastructure support. Implementation Science. 10(1). 88–88. 257 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Morrow‐Howell, Nancy, et al.. (2014). Volunteering as a Pathway to Productive and Social Engagement Among Older Adults. Health Education & Behavior. 41(1_suppl). 84S–90S. 45 indexed citations
7.
Morrow‐Howell, Nancy, et al.. (2011). Changes in Activity Among Older Volunteers. Research on Aging. 34(2). 174–196. 30 indexed citations
8.
McBride, Amanda Moore, Ernest Gonzales, Nancy Morrow‐Howell, & Stacey McCrary. (2011). Stipends in Volunteer Civic Service: Inclusion, Retention, and Volunteer Benefits. Public Administration Review. 71(6). 850–858. 43 indexed citations
9.
Gattis, Maurice N., Nancy Morrow‐Howell, Stacey McCrary, et al.. (2010). Examining the Effects of New York Experience Corps® Program on Young Readers. Literacy Research and Instruction. 49(4). 299–314. 19 indexed citations
10.
Gattis, Maurice N., Nancy Morrow‐Howell, Stacey McCrary, et al.. (2010). Examining the Effects of New York Experience Corps® Program on Young Readers Literacy. 1 indexed citations
11.
Morrow‐Howell, Nancy, et al.. (2010). The Effect of the Experience Corps® Program on Student Reading Outcomes. Education and Urban Society. 44(1). 97–118. 35 indexed citations
12.
Morrow‐Howell, Nancy, et al.. (2009). Evaluation of Experience Corps Student Reading Outcomes. Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis). 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026