Stacey Frederick

984 total citations
21 papers, 482 citations indexed

About

Stacey Frederick is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Stacey Frederick has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 482 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Strategy and Management, 11 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Stacey Frederick's work include Global trade and economics (11 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (10 papers) and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (4 papers). Stacey Frederick is often cited by papers focused on Global trade and economics (11 papers), Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (10 papers) and Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (4 papers). Stacey Frederick collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and China. Stacey Frederick's co-authors include Gary Gereffi, Penny Bamber, Jennifer Bair, Karina Fernández-Stark, Nancy L. Cassill, Sarah McCaffrey, Christine S. Olsen, Bruce Shindler, Eric Toman and Melanie Stidham and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Nanoparticle Research, Society & Natural Resources and Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society.

In The Last Decade

Stacey Frederick

21 papers receiving 410 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stacey Frederick United States 8 315 175 97 84 49 21 482
Jeff Readman United Kingdom 7 219 0.7× 63 0.4× 63 0.6× 44 0.5× 70 1.4× 9 413
Kaoru Natsuda Japan 11 184 0.6× 151 0.9× 100 1.0× 37 0.4× 19 0.4× 28 399
Karina Fernández-Stark United States 8 297 0.9× 166 0.9× 100 1.0× 101 1.2× 20 0.4× 15 457
Claes G. Alvstam Sweden 11 388 1.2× 192 1.1× 173 1.8× 77 0.9× 43 0.9× 31 537
Jostein Hauge United Kingdom 8 100 0.3× 73 0.4× 76 0.8× 37 0.4× 15 0.3× 12 262
Paola Perez-Aleman Canada 10 308 1.0× 35 0.2× 68 0.7× 155 1.8× 18 0.4× 17 464
Deborah Elms Thailand 6 224 0.7× 231 1.3× 114 1.2× 54 0.6× 15 0.3× 22 492
Evert‐Jan Visser Netherlands 9 193 0.6× 68 0.4× 131 1.4× 18 0.2× 40 0.8× 17 465
Hildegunn Kyvik Nordås Sweden 12 223 0.7× 344 2.0× 229 2.4× 13 0.2× 19 0.4× 55 479
Nataliya Smorodinskaya Russia 8 182 0.6× 49 0.3× 142 1.5× 36 0.4× 11 0.2× 17 370

Countries citing papers authored by Stacey Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stacey Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stacey Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stacey Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stacey Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stacey Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stacey Frederick. The network helps show where Stacey Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stacey Frederick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stacey Frederick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stacey Frederick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stacey Frederick. Stacey Frederick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Frederick, Stacey, et al.. (2021). From Jobs to Careers: Apparel Exports and Career Paths for Women in Developing Countries. The World Bank eBooks. 2 indexed citations
2.
Gereffi, Gary, Stacey Frederick, & Penny Bamber. (2019). Diverse Paths of Upgrading in High-Tech Manufacturing: Costa Rica in the Electronics and Medical Devices Global Value Chains. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations
3.
Frederick, Stacey, et al.. (2018). Digitalization and global value chains in the Korean manufacturing. Kagoshima Kenritsu Tanki Daigaku Chiiki Kenkyūjo kenkyū nenpō. 1 indexed citations
4.
Frederick, Stacey, et al.. (2018). E-Commerce and Industrial Upgrading in the Chinese Apparel Value Chain. Journal of Contemporary Asia. 49(1). 24–53. 84 indexed citations
5.
Bamber, Penny, et al.. (2017). Korea in Global Value Chains: Pathways for Industrial Transformation. 7 indexed citations
6.
Bamber, Penny, Stacey Frederick, & Gary Gereffi. (2016). The Philippines in the Aerospace Global Value Chain. DukeSpace (Duke University). 1–77. 3 indexed citations
7.
Sturgeon, Timothy, et al.. (2016). The Philippines in the Automotive Global Value Chain. DukeSpace (Duke University). 1–52. 5 indexed citations
8.
Bamber, Penny, Stacey Frederick, & Gary Gereffi. (2016). The Philippines in the Chemical Global Value Chain. DukeSpace (Duke University). 1–75. 1 indexed citations
9.
Frederick, Stacey & Gary Gereffi. (2016). The Philippines in the Electronics & Electrical Global Value Chain. 1–76. 2 indexed citations
10.
Frederick, Stacey, Jennifer Bair, & Gary Gereffi. (2015). Regional trade agreements and export competitiveness: the uncertain path of Nicaragua’s apparel exports under CAFTA. Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society. 8(3). 403–420. 12 indexed citations
11.
Stidham, Melanie, Christine S. Olsen, Eric Toman, et al.. (2014). Longitudinal Social Science Research in Natural Resource Communities: Lessons and Considerations. Society & Natural Resources. 27(10). 1104–1108. 11 indexed citations
12.
Frederick, Stacey. (2014). Combining the Global Value Chain and global I-O approaches Discussion paper. 2 indexed citations
13.
Frederick, Stacey, et al.. (2013). Twelve years of nanoscience and nanotechnology publications in Mexico. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 16(1). 4 indexed citations
14.
Frederick, Stacey, et al.. (2011). Traveling Technologies: Societal Implications of Nanotechnology Through the Global Value Chain. 3(1). 36–44. 3 indexed citations
15.
Frederick, Stacey & Gary Gereffi. (2011). Upgrading and restructuring in the global apparel value chain: why China and Asia are outperforming Mexico and Central America. International Journal of Technological Learning Innovation and Development. 4(1/2/3). 67–67. 60 indexed citations
16.
Fernández-Stark, Karina, Stacey Frederick, & Gary Gereffi. (2011). The Apparel Global Value Chain. 11 indexed citations
17.
Gereffi, Gary & Stacey Frederick. (2010). Challenges and Opportunities for Developing Countries. The World Bank Open Knowledge Repository (World Bank). 176 indexed citations
18.
Frederick, Stacey. (2010). Development and application of a value chain research approach to understand and evaluate internal and external factors and relationships affecting economic competitiveness in the textile value chain. NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries). 12 indexed citations
19.
Gereffi, Gary & Stacey Frederick. (2010). The Global Apparel Value Chain, Trade And The Crisis : Challenges And Opportunities For Developing Countries. World Bank eBooks. 72 indexed citations
20.
Frederick, Stacey & Nancy L. Cassill. (2009). Industry clusters and global value chains: analytical frameworks to study the new world of textiles. Journal of the Textile Institute. 100(8). 668–681. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026