Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Inflation and the conformal structure of higher-order gravity theories
1988400 citationsJohn D. Barrow, Spiros CotsakisPhysics Letters Bprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Spiros Cotsakis
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Spiros Cotsakis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Spiros Cotsakis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Spiros Cotsakis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Spiros Cotsakis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Spiros Cotsakis. The network helps show where Spiros Cotsakis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Spiros Cotsakis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Spiros Cotsakis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Spiros Cotsakis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Spiros Cotsakis. Spiros Cotsakis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cotsakis, Spiros, P. G. L. Leach, & Chara Pantazi. (2004). Symmetries of homogeneous cosmologies. Gravitation and Cosmology. 4. 314–325.11 indexed citations
9.
Plionis, M., et al.. (2002). Modern theoretical and observational cosmology : proceedings of the 2nd Hellenic cosmology meeting, held in the National Observatory of Athens, Penteli, 19-20 April 2001. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks.1 indexed citations
Leach, P. G. L., et al.. (2001). Symmetry, singularities and intregrability in complex dynamics VII: Integrability Properties of FRW-Scalar Cosmologies. Gravitation and Cosmology. 7. 311–320.6 indexed citations
12.
Cotsakis, Spiros, et al.. (2000). Ever-Expanding, Isotropizing, Quadratic cosmologies. Gravitation and Cosmology. 6. 291–302.2 indexed citations
13.
Cotsakis, Spiros, et al.. (2000). Spherically Symmetric Solutions for p-Brane Models Associated with Lie Algebras. Gravitation and Cosmology. 6. 66–75.3 indexed citations
Cotsakis, Spiros, et al.. (2000). Symmetry, singularities and integrability in complex dynamics. 4. Painleve integrability of isotropic cosmologies. Gravitation and Cosmology. 6. 282–290.8 indexed citations
16.
Cotsakis, Spiros, et al.. (1996). Global structure and evolution in general relativity : proceedings of the First Samos Meeting on Cosmology, Geometry and Relativity held at Karlovassi, Samos, Greece, 5-7 September 1994. Springer eBooks.1 indexed citations
Cotsakis, Spiros. (1990). Cosmological Models in Higher-Order Gravity. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).2 indexed citations
20.
Barrow, John D. & Spiros Cotsakis. (1988). Inflation and the conformal structure of higher-order gravity theories. Physics Letters B. 214(4). 515–518.400 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.