Sophie Portrat

1.8k total citations
35 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Sophie Portrat is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Sophie Portrat has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 22 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 5 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Sophie Portrat's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (26 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (15 papers) and Cognitive Functions and Memory (13 papers). Sophie Portrat is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (26 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (15 papers) and Cognitive Functions and Memory (13 papers). Sophie Portrat collaborates with scholars based in France, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Sophie Portrat's co-authors include Valérie Camos, Pierre Barrouillet, Evie Vergauwe, Benoı̂t Lemaire, Gaën Plancher, Vanessa M. Loaiza, Alessandra S. Souza, Matthew R. Johnson, Pascal Hot and Alessandro Guida and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Psychological Review and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Sophie Portrat

29 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sophie Portrat France 14 934 542 231 120 96 35 1.2k
Peter F. Delaney United States 18 644 0.7× 324 0.6× 340 1.5× 209 1.7× 159 1.7× 34 997
Eddy J. Davelaar United Kingdom 19 983 1.1× 334 0.6× 227 1.0× 154 1.3× 135 1.4× 59 1.3k
Alessandra S. Souza Switzerland 23 1.8k 1.9× 734 1.4× 316 1.4× 88 0.7× 292 3.0× 69 2.1k
Jessica I. Fleck United States 12 985 1.1× 840 1.5× 181 0.8× 160 1.3× 210 2.2× 20 1.4k
Aimée M. Surprenant United States 22 1.0k 1.1× 466 0.9× 419 1.8× 213 1.8× 93 1.0× 79 1.3k
Geoff Ward United Kingdom 23 1.4k 1.5× 517 1.0× 403 1.7× 338 2.8× 169 1.8× 49 1.8k
Evie Vergauwe Switzerland 21 1.6k 1.7× 864 1.6× 376 1.6× 171 1.4× 219 2.3× 56 2.0k
Henk J. Haarmann United States 18 954 1.0× 254 0.5× 471 2.0× 129 1.1× 98 1.0× 22 1.1k
Dan J. Woltz United States 17 443 0.5× 278 0.5× 328 1.4× 128 1.1× 156 1.6× 41 919
Pei Chun Shih Spain 17 606 0.6× 855 1.6× 348 1.5× 263 2.2× 119 1.2× 20 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Sophie Portrat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sophie Portrat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sophie Portrat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sophie Portrat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sophie Portrat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sophie Portrat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sophie Portrat. The network helps show where Sophie Portrat may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sophie Portrat

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sophie Portrat. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sophie Portrat based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sophie Portrat. Sophie Portrat is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Portrat, Sophie, et al.. (2025). What a shot! Effect of biathlon and badminton on attention of preteens in middle schools: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 1–22.
2.
Eichenlaub, Jean‐Baptiste, et al.. (2024). Dream habits in a large cohort of preteens and their relation to sleep and nocturnal awakenings. Journal of Sleep Research. 34(2). e14339–e14339.
3.
Lemaire, Benoı̂t, et al.. (2024). Does the extension of free time trigger spontaneous elaborative strategies in working memory?. Memory & Cognition. 52(8). 2022–2052.
4.
Lemaire, Benoı̂t, et al.. (2023). A Hebbian Model to Account for Musical Expertise Differences in a Working Memory Task. Cognitive Computation. 15(5). 1620–1639.
5.
Lemaire, Benoı̂t, et al.. (2023). Similarity-Based Compression in Working Memory: Implications for Decay and Refreshing Models. Computational Brain & Behavior. 7(1). 163–180.
6.
Moulin, Chris J. A., et al.. (2023). Retrospective judgments of confidence in a complex span task. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 18535–18535. 1 indexed citations
7.
Lemaire, Benoı̂t, et al.. (2022). Between-item similarity frees up working memory resources through compression: A domain-general property.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 151(11). 2641–2665. 10 indexed citations
8.
Eichenlaub, Jean‐Baptiste, et al.. (2022). Sleep habits and their relation to self-reported attention and class climate in preteens. Sleep Medicine. 101. 421–428. 2 indexed citations
9.
Lemaire, Benoı̂t, et al.. (2021). Can activated long-term memory maintain serial order information?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 28(4). 1301–1312. 6 indexed citations
10.
Lemaire, Benoı̂t & Sophie Portrat. (2018). A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 416–416. 22 indexed citations
11.
Plancher, Gaën, et al.. (2018). What makes working memory traces stable over time?. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1424(1). 149–160. 24 indexed citations
12.
Portrat, Sophie, et al.. (2018). Aging Influences the Efficiency of Attentional Maintenance in Verbal Working Memory. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 74(4). 600–608. 8 indexed citations
13.
Lemaire, Benoı̂t, et al.. (2017). What is the time course of working memory attentional refreshing?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 25(1). 370–385. 40 indexed citations
14.
Lemaire, Benoı̂t, et al.. (2016). Reconciling Two Computational Models of Working Memory in Aging. Topics in Cognitive Science. 8(1). 264–278. 16 indexed citations
15.
Portrat, Sophie, et al.. (2015). Promoting the experimental dialogue between working memory and chunking: Behavioral data and simulation. Memory & Cognition. 44(3). 420–434. 28 indexed citations
16.
Portrat, Sophie & Benoı̂t Lemaire. (2014). Is Attentional Refreshing in Working Memory Sequential? A Computational Modeling Approach. Cognitive Computation. 7(3). 333–345. 29 indexed citations
17.
Barrouillet, Pierre, Sophie Portrat, & Valérie Camos. (2011). On the law relating processing to storage in working memory.. Psychological Review. 118(2). 175–192. 217 indexed citations
18.
Portrat, Sophie, Pierre Barrouillet, & Valérie Camos. (2008). Time-related decay or interference-based forgetting in working memory?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 34(6). 1561–1564. 90 indexed citations
19.
Portrat, Sophie, Valérie Camos, & Pierre Barrouillet. (2008). Working memory in children: A time-constrained functioning similar to adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 102(3). 368–374. 37 indexed citations
20.
Barrouillet, Pierre, et al.. (2007). Time and cognitive load in working memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 33(3). 570–585. 428 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026