Shu‐Ting Cho
Impact in
- Horticulture top 1%
- Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
- Plant Science top 5%
- Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens
- Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
- Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis
Papers in
-
- Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens 13
- Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies 12
-
- Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies 9
- Studies on Chitinases and Chitosanases 3
- Co-authors
- Chih‐Horng Kuo (27 shared papers)Saskia A. Hogenhout (7 shared papers)Weijie Huang (3 shared papers)Mindia Haryono (5 shared papers)Faina Kamilova (1 shared paper)Ben Lugtenberg (1 shared paper)Erh‐Min Lai (6 shared papers)Dilfuza Egamberdieva (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Frontiers in Microbiology (6 papers)PLoS ONE (2 papers)mSystems (1 paper)Plant Science (1 paper)BMC Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- TaiwanUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Shu‐Ting Cho
29 papers receiving 592 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Horticulture 89
- Plant Science 429
- Endocrinology 51
- Insect Science 119
- Molecular Medicine 34
Countries citing papers authored by Shu‐Ting Cho
This map shows the geographic impact of Shu‐Ting Cho's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shu‐Ting Cho with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shu‐Ting Cho more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shu‐Ting Cho
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shu‐Ting Cho. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shu‐Ting Cho. The network helps show where Shu‐Ting Cho may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Shu‐Ting Cho, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 103 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 87 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 37 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 27 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 21 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2022 | 19 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2018 | 9 |
About Shu‐Ting Cho
Shu‐Ting Cho is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Insect Science, Endocrinology and Horticulture, having authored 31 papers that have together received 618 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (13 papers), Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies (12 papers), Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies (9 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (8 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (4 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (4 papers), Studies on Chitinases and Chitosanases (3 papers) and Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Horticulture (89 citations), Plant Science (429 citations), Endocrinology (51 citations), Insect Science (119 citations) and Molecular Medicine (34 citations). Shu‐Ting Cho has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Chih‐Horng Kuo, Saskia A. Hogenhout, Weijie Huang, Mindia Haryono, Faina Kamilova, Ben Lugtenberg, Erh‐Min Lai, Dilfuza Egamberdieva, Ya‐Yi Huang and Akiko Sugio. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Microbiology, PLoS ONE, mSystems, Plant Science and BMC Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.