Shu-Kun Gao
About
In The Last Decade
Shu-Kun Gao
5 papers receiving 113 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Food Science 60
- Molecular Biology 39
- Nutrition and Dietetics 37
- Aquatic Science 21
- Biotechnology 15
Countries citing papers authored by Shu-Kun Gao
This map shows the geographic impact of Shu-Kun Gao's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shu-Kun Gao with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shu-Kun Gao more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shu-Kun Gao
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shu-Kun Gao. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shu-Kun Gao. The network helps show where Shu-Kun Gao may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shu-Kun Gao
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shu-Kun Gao. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shu-Kun Gao based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shu-Kun Gao. Shu-Kun Gao is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 77 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 30 | |
| 5 | Five-Year Analysis of Patients Discharged from Beijing Anding Hospital | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.