Shirley E. Maddison
- Parasitology top 1%
- Infectious Diseases top 5%
- Ecology top 5%
- Surgery
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Victor C. W. TsangR. Elsdon‐DewIrving G. KaganSusan B. SlemendaS. J. PowellKathy HancockBrett WilsonLois Norman
- Topics
- Parasites and Host Interactions (32 papers)Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (13 papers)Amoebic Infections and Treatments (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaGhana
In The Last Decade
Shirley E. Maddison
61 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Parasitology 605
- Infectious Diseases 374
- Ecology 277
- Surgery 220
- Epidemiology 203
Countries citing papers authored by Shirley E. Maddison
This map shows the geographic impact of Shirley E. Maddison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shirley E. Maddison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shirley E. Maddison more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shirley E. Maddison
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shirley E. Maddison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shirley E. Maddison. The network helps show where Shirley E. Maddison may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shirley E. Maddison
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shirley E. Maddison. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shirley E. Maddison based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shirley E. Maddison. Shirley E. Maddison is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 110 | |
| 3 | 28 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | Standardization of FIAXtm for schistosomiasis using crude cercarial and adult worm antigens. | 6 |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | Immunoglobulin Specificity fortheFluorescent Treponemal Antibody-Absorption TestConjugate | 2 |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 15 | |
| 18 | 93 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | The antigens of tapeworms. Preliminary note. | 6 |
About Shirley E. Maddison
Shirley E. Maddison is a scholar working on Parasitology, Small Animals and Infectious Diseases, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parasites and Host Interactions (32 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (13 papers) and Amoebic Infections and Treatments (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (605 citations), Small Animals (199 citations) and Infectious Diseases (374 citations). Shirley E. Maddison has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Ghana. Frequent co-authors include Victor C. W. Tsang, R. Elsdon‐Dew, Irving G. Kagan, Susan B. Slemenda, S. J. Powell, Kathy Hancock, Brett Wilson, Lois Norman, Charles B. Reimer and Mitchell P. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Science, New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.