Shira Schecter Weiner
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Surgery
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology top 5%
- Occupational Therapy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Margareta NordinRudi HiebertDavid GoldsheyderEugene J. CarrageeGabrielle van der VeldePaul M. PelosoSheilah Hogg‐JohnsonJaime Guzmán
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers)Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (7 papers)Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenCanada
In The Last Decade
Shira Schecter Weiner
16 papers receiving 503 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Pharmacology 403
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 179
- Surgery 121
- Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 74
- Occupational Therapy 65
Countries citing papers authored by Shira Schecter Weiner
This map shows the geographic impact of Shira Schecter Weiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shira Schecter Weiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shira Schecter Weiner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shira Schecter Weiner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shira Schecter Weiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shira Schecter Weiner. The network helps show where Shira Schecter Weiner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shira Schecter Weiner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shira Schecter Weiner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shira Schecter Weiner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shira Schecter Weiner. Shira Schecter Weiner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 84 | |
| 11 | 47 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 138 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 46 | |
| 16 | 63 |
About Shira Schecter Weiner
Shira Schecter Weiner is a scholar working on Medical Laboratory Technology, Pharmacology and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 527 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (11 papers), Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology (7 papers) and Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (38 citations), Pharmacology (403 citations) and Occupational Therapy (65 citations). Shira Schecter Weiner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Margareta Nordin, Rudi Hiebert, David Goldsheyder, Eugene J. Carragee, Gabrielle van der Velde, Paul M. Peloso, Sheilah Hogg‐Johnson, Jaime Guzmán, Lena W. Holm and J. David Cassidy. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.