Sheng‐Ping Yang
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Biochemistry top 1%
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
Papers in
-
- Phytochemical compounds biological activities 37
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 32
- Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids 12
-
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 12
- Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry 9
- Co-authors
- Jian‐Min Yue (85 shared papers)Yan Wu (25 shared papers)Chuan‐Rui Zhang (21 shared papers)Shang‐Gao Liao (16 shared papers)Huadong Chen (14 shared papers)Huabin Hu (7 shared papers)Cheng‐Qi Fan (7 shared papers)Jian Ding (11 shared papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Natural Products (22 papers)Organic Letters (14 papers)Tetrahedron (7 papers)Helvetica Chimica Acta (7 papers)Chinese Journal of Chemistry (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesHong Kong
In The Last Decade
Sheng‐Ping Yang
113 papers receiving 3.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Pharmacology 488
- Biochemistry 409
- Horticulture 34
- Cancer Research 458
- Toxicology 101
Countries citing papers authored by Sheng‐Ping Yang
This map shows the geographic impact of Sheng‐Ping Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheng‐Ping Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheng‐Ping Yang more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sheng‐Ping Yang
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheng‐Ping Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheng‐Ping Yang. The network helps show where Sheng‐Ping Yang may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sheng‐Ping Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 115 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 108 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 86 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 74 | |
| 4 | 2008 | 73 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 71 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 66 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 64 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 62 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 61 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 58 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 57 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 54 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 52 | |
| 14 | 2010 | 52 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 52 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 51 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 51 | |
| 18 | 2010 | 50 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 49 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 48 |
About Sheng‐Ping Yang
Sheng‐Ping Yang is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Plant Science, Cancer Research and Biochemistry, having authored 115 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemical compounds biological activities (37 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (32 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (17 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (17 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (16 papers), Biological Activity of Diterpenoids and Biflavonoids (12 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (12 papers) and Advanced Synthetic Organic Chemistry (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (488 citations), Biochemistry (409 citations), Horticulture (34 citations), Cancer Research (458 citations) and Toxicology (101 citations). Sheng‐Ping Yang has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Jian‐Min Yue, Yan Wu, Chuan‐Rui Zhang, Shang‐Gao Liao, Huadong Chen, Huabin Hu, Cheng‐Qi Fan, Jian Ding, Tao Yuan and Quan Li. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Organic Letters, Tetrahedron, Helvetica Chimica Acta and Chinese Journal of Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.