Sheldon Peck

57 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Sheldon Peck's Hit Papers

A concept of facial esthetics. 1970 · 421 citations
4210+18+37Years since publication100200300400

Peers

Sheldon Peck
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Orthodontics 1.3k
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 441
  • Oral Surgery 1.1k
  • Emergency Medical Services 281
  • Genetics 889
Replace Leena Peck with:
Leena Peck United States
Katherine W. L. Vig United States
Robert J. Isaacson United States
J. F. Camilla Tulloch United States
Ellen A. BeGole United States
F.P.G.M. van der Linden Netherlands
J.P. Moss United Kingdom
Daniela Gamba Garib Brazil
A Demirjian Canada
Donald Burden United Kingdom
Sheldon Peck relative to Leena Peck United States Leena Peck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Leena Peck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sheldon Peck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sheldon Peck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sheldon Peck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sheldon Peck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sheldon Peck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sheldon Peck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sheldon Peck. The network helps show where Sheldon Peck may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sheldon Peck, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sheldon Peck Line = papers co-authored together Sheldon Peck links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 64 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
A concept of facial esthetics.
Hit paper breakdown →
1970421
2 1994408
3 1991231
4 1993199
5 1992188
6 1995178
7 1995154
8 2002148
9 1996146
10 1992126
11 1972117
12 2008107
13 1998104
14 199882
15 199877
16 200075
17 199674
18 197271
19 200060
20 201045

About Sheldon Peck

Sheldon Peck is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Oral Surgery, Genetics, Orthodontics and General Health Professions, having authored 64 papers that have together received 3.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include dental development and anomalies (29 papers), Cleft Lip and Palate Research (16 papers), Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (14 papers), Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology (10 papers), Dental Education, Practice, Research (8 papers), History of Medical Practice (7 papers), Dental Trauma and Treatments (6 papers) and Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthodontics (1.3k citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (441 citations), Oral Surgery (1.1k citations), Emergency Medical Services (281 citations) and Genetics (889 citations). Sheldon Peck has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Leena Peck, Matti Kataja, Harvey Peck, Daniela Gamba Garib, Atalia Wasserstein, Miriam Shalish, Carl‐Magnus Forsberg, Anders Lundström, Ingalill Feldmann and Miri Shalish. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, The Angle Orthodontist, Seminars in Orthodontics, The Journal of the American Dental Association and Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact