Shannon C. Houck

927 total citations
28 papers, 574 citations indexed

About

Shannon C. Houck is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Shannon C. Houck has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 574 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 14 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Shannon C. Houck's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (7 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers). Shannon C. Houck is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (7 papers) and Cultural Differences and Values (6 papers). Shannon C. Houck collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Shannon C. Houck's co-authors include Lucian Gideon Conway, Laura Janelle Gornick, Meredith A. Repke, Kathrene Conway, Chris Anderson, Jennifer A. Stockert, Roger G. Tweed, Victoria C. Plaut, Laura V. Machia and Kari Jo Harris and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

Shannon C. Houck

24 papers receiving 558 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Shannon C. Houck United States 13 413 233 98 83 55 28 574
Laura Janelle Gornick United States 9 299 0.7× 183 0.8× 67 0.7× 56 0.7× 42 0.8× 10 420
G. Scott Morgan United States 11 602 1.5× 348 1.5× 91 0.9× 236 2.8× 23 0.4× 14 776
Vivienne Badaan United States 12 587 1.4× 332 1.4× 96 1.0× 86 1.0× 43 0.8× 16 719
Jared Celniker United States 5 286 0.7× 92 0.4× 58 0.6× 85 1.0× 36 0.7× 11 384
Andrea Pereira Switzerland 10 510 1.2× 152 0.7× 76 0.8× 137 1.7× 78 1.4× 15 678
Michael N. Stagnaro United States 10 287 0.7× 76 0.3× 59 0.6× 86 1.0× 40 0.7× 23 429
Cengiz Erişen Türkiye 13 428 1.0× 73 0.3× 294 3.0× 32 0.4× 48 0.9× 35 605
Brandon Warmke United States 11 185 0.4× 145 0.6× 51 0.5× 164 2.0× 41 0.7× 25 403
Jennifer Lambe United States 11 265 0.6× 143 0.6× 59 0.6× 13 0.2× 59 1.1× 38 529
Carina Wolf Germany 8 659 1.6× 236 1.0× 156 1.6× 44 0.5× 36 0.7× 13 812

Countries citing papers authored by Shannon C. Houck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Shannon C. Houck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shannon C. Houck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shannon C. Houck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Shannon C. Houck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shannon C. Houck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shannon C. Houck. The network helps show where Shannon C. Houck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shannon C. Houck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shannon C. Houck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shannon C. Houck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shannon C. Houck. Shannon C. Houck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Houck, Shannon C.. (2024). Building psychological resilience to defend sovereignty: theoretical insights for Mongolia. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2.
3.
Houck, Shannon C., et al.. (2022). Implications of Neurological Directed-Energy Weapons for Military Medicine. Journal of Special Operations Medicine. 22(3). 104–104. 1 indexed citations
5.
Conway, Lucian Gideon, Kathrene Conway, & Shannon C. Houck. (2020). Validating automated integrative complexity: Natural language processing and the Donald Trump Test. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 8(2). 504–524. 12 indexed citations
6.
Conway, Lucian Gideon, Kathrene Conway, & Shannon C. Houck. (2020). Supplementary materials to: Validating Automated Integrative Complexity: Natural language processing and the Donald Trump Test. Psychology Archives. 1 indexed citations
7.
Houck, Shannon C., et al.. (2019). When Beliefs Lead to (Im)Moral Action: How Believing in Torture's Effectiveness Shapes the Endorsement of Its Use. Political Psychology. 40(6). 1315–1339. 7 indexed citations
9.
Houck, Shannon C., et al.. (2018). An Integrative Complexity Analysis of Religious and Irreligious Thinking. SAGE Open. 8(3). 8 indexed citations
10.
Conway, Lucian Gideon, Victoria C. Plaut, Laura Janelle Gornick, et al.. (2017). Ecological Origins of Freedom: Pathogens, Heat Stress, and Frontier Topography Predict More Vertical but Less Horizontal Governmental Restriction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 43(10). 1378–1398. 33 indexed citations
11.
Conway, Lucian Gideon, Meredith A. Repke, & Shannon C. Houck. (2017). Donald Trump as a cultural revolt against perceived communication restriction: Priming political correctness norms causes more Trump support. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 5(1). 244–259. 50 indexed citations
12.
Repke, Meredith A., Lucian Gideon Conway, & Shannon C. Houck. (2017). The Strategic Manipulation of Linguistic Complexity: A Test of Two Models of Lying. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 37(1). 74–92. 10 indexed citations
13.
Conway, Lucian Gideon, Meredith A. Repke, & Shannon C. Houck. (2016). Psychological Spacetime. SAGE Open. 6(4). 4 indexed citations
14.
Conway, Lucian Gideon, Shannon C. Houck, Laura Janelle Gornick, & Meredith A. Repke. (2016). Ideologically Motivated Perceptions of Complexity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 35(6). 708–718. 17 indexed citations
15.
Houck, Shannon C. & Lucian Gideon Conway. (2015). Ethically Investigating Torture Efficacy: A New Methodology to Test the Influence of Physical Pain on Decision-Making Processes in Experimental Interrogation Scenarios. Journal of Applied Security Research. 10(4). 510–524. 5 indexed citations
16.
Conway, Lucian Gideon, et al.. (2015). Are Conservatives Really More Simple‐Minded than Liberals? The Domain Specificity of Complex Thinking. Political Psychology. 37(6). 777–798. 75 indexed citations
17.
Houck, Shannon C.. (2015). The Cognitive Dissonance Theory of Torture Perceptions. The Mathematics Enthusiast. 1 indexed citations
18.
Houck, Shannon C., Lucian Gideon Conway, & Laura Janelle Gornick. (2014). Automated Integrative Complexity: Current Challenges and Future Directions. Political Psychology. 35(5). 647–659. 36 indexed citations
19.
Houck, Shannon C., Lucian Gideon Conway, & Meredith A. Repke. (2014). Personal closeness and perceived torture efficacy: If torture will save someone I’m close to, then it must work.. Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology. 20(4). 590–592. 12 indexed citations
20.
Houck, Shannon C. & Lucian Gideon Conway. (2013). What People Think About Torture: Torture Is Inherently Bad … Unless It Can Save Someone I Love. Journal of Applied Security Research. 8(4). 429–454. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026